Effects of Root Pruning and Shallow Plowing on Soil Properties and Plant Communities in Deteriorated Steppe

高志成,田佳妮,宝音陶格涛,舒锴,霍艳双
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201606261255
2017-01-01
Abstract:Grassland degradation is one of the main ecological problems in the arid and semi-arid areas of China.Nitrogen content,which is typically reflected by the mineralization rate of soil nitrate nitrogen,plays a very significant role in plant life in deteriorated steppe regions.The key to addressing the limitation of soil nitrogen content is determining how to increase the exchange speed of soil nitrate nitrogen mineralization using different ameliorative treatments.Furthermore,biomass,the accumulation of organic matter per unit leaf area,is also a vital evaluation factor for primary productivity.Species diversity,the index of which generally increases with an increase of biomass,is an indicator of ecosystem stability.The species diversity of deteriorated steppe communities reflects the restoration status of grassland and changes in soil physical and chemical properties.The aim of the present study was to provide a scientific basis for the development of deteriorated steppe restoration by determining the effective use of different ameliorative treatments.In this regard,we examined the effects of two typical ameliorative treatments,namely,shallow plowing and root pruning of deteriorated grassland,in Inner Mongolia in order to determine the effects of different treatments on soil properties (the mineralization rate of soil nitrate nitrogen)and the character of Leymus chinensis communities (biomass and biodiversity).The data was obtained at the research base of the School of Life Science,Inner Mongolia University of Mao Deng grassland,Xilin Gol,Inner Mongolia.The research focused on the relationship between different treatments and biodiversity,biomass,and the mineralization rate of soil nitrate nitrogen.Compared with the control treatment,our results indicate that the mineralization rate of soil nitrate nitrogen was reduced by shallow plowing (P < 0.05).This might be attributable to changes in soil structure and the natural habitat of most plant caused by shallow plowing,which often causes marked disturbance to the soil in the first and second years after plowing.The mineralization rate of soil nitrate nitrogen was increased by root pruning but the effect was not significant.This might be due to the reduction in certain species whose growth requires a high content of nitrite nitrogen,although the total biomass increased.The nineralization rate of soil nitrate nitrogen differed according to the time of year.The lowest nitrification rate was in June,whereas the highest was in September.Shallow plowing significantly reduced the diversity and biomass of the L.chinensis community,whereas root pruning significantly increased the diversity of this community (P <0.05).This is because the growth of annuals is more rapid in seasons with high precipitation.Root pruning reduced the competition between short-lived plants and other plants.Accordingly,annuals could grow very well and increased in number.This might be closely related to the increase in biomass.Although the biomass of the L.chinensis community was incr eased by root pruning,the difference was not significant.The data show that different treatments have a marked impact on soil properties and biota.Furthermore,root pruning treatment,but not shallow plowing,contributes to the biodiversity of deteriorated steppe in the short term.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?