Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of antiplatelet therapy among patients at high risk of occlusive vascular events.DESIGN: Collaborative meta-analyses (systematic overviews).INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of an antiplatelet regimen versus control or of one antiplatelet regimen versus another in high risk patients (with acute or previous vascular disease or some other predisposing condition) from which results were available before September 1997. Trials had to use a method of randomisation that precluded prior knowledge of the next treatment to be allocated and comparisons had to be unconfounded-that is, have study groups that differed only in terms of antiplatelet regimen.STUDIES REVIEWED: 287 studies involving 135 000 patients in comparisons of antiplatelet therapy versus control and 77 000 in comparisons of different antiplatelet regimens.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: "Serious vascular event": non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or vascular death.RESULTS: Overall, among these high risk patients, allocation to antiplatelet therapy reduced the combined outcome of any serious vascular event by about one quarter; non-fatal myocardial infarction was reduced by one third, non-fatal stroke by one quarter, and vascular mortality by one sixth (with no apparent adverse effect on other deaths). Absolute reductions in the risk of having a serious vascular event were 36 (SE 5) per 1000 treated for two years among patients with previous myocardial infarction; 38 (5) per 1000 patients treated for one month among patients with acute myocardial infarction; 36 (6) per 1000 treated for two years among those with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; 9 (3) per 1000 treated for three weeks among those with acute stroke; and 22 (3) per 1000 treated for two years among other high risk patients (with separately significant results for those with stable angina (P=0.0005), peripheral arterial disease (P=0.004), and atrial fibrillation (P=0.01)). In each of these high risk categories, the absolute benefits substantially outweighed the absolute risks of major extracranial bleeding. Aspirin was the most widely studied antiplatelet drug, with doses of 75-150 mg daily at least as effective as higher daily doses. The effects of doses lower than 75 mg daily were less certain. Clopidogrel reduced serious vascular events by 10% (4%) compared with aspirin, which was similar to the 12% (7%) reduction observed with its analogue ticlopidine. Addition of dipyridamole to aspirin produced no significant further reduction in vascular events compared with aspirin alone. Among patients at high risk of immediate coronary occlusion, short term addition of an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevented a further 20 (4) vascular events per 1000 (P<0.0001) but caused 23 major (but rarely fatal) extracranial bleeds per 1000.CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin (or another oral antiplatelet drug) is protective in most types of patient at increased risk of occlusive vascular events, including those with an acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke, unstable or stable angina, previous myocardial infarction, stroke or cerebral ischaemia, peripheral arterial disease, or atrial fibrillation. Low dose aspirin (75-150 mg daily) is an effective antiplatelet regimen for long term use, but in acute settings an initial loading dose of at least 150 mg aspirin may be required. Adding a second antiplatelet drug to aspirin may produce additional benefits in some clinical circumstances, but more research into this strategy is needed.

Older Patients Should Take Ppis To Cut Risk Of Bleed From Aspirin, Study Says

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Prophylaxis on Clinical Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Low-Dose Aspirin and the Risk of Stroke and Intracerebral Bleeding in Healthy Older People: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Benefit and Harm of Aspirin on Mortality From Gastrointestinal Cancers Vs Bleeding in Helicobacter pylori-Eradicated Patients

Effectiveness and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Elderly Patients With Ischemic Stroke

Management of High-risk Patients on Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs or Aspirin

Dose-response of Aspirin on Platelet Function in Very Elderly Patients

Outcomes Associated with 50 Mg/d and 100 Mg/d Aspirin for the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Chinese Elderly: Single-Center Interim Analysis of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study

Prolonged Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Thrombohemorrhagic Risk in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera Patients Treated with Long-Term Aspirin: A Pilot Study

Trends in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients on Primary Prevention Aspirin: A Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Analysis, 2016-2020

Gastrointestinal bleeding associated with low-dose aspirin use: relevance and management in clinical practice

Bleeding Peptic Ulcer in the Elderly

Anti-platelet Therapy and Managing Ulcer Risk.

Risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding among aspirin users: An old issue with new findings from a population-based cohort study

Similar Efficacy of Proton-Pump Inhibitors Vs H2-Receptor Antagonists in Reducing Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding or Ulcers in High-Risk Users of Low-Dose Aspirin

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the risk of small bowel or colorectal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients

Aspirin for prevention of colorectal cancer in the elderly: friend or foe?

Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors with Aspirin-Clopidogrel Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Optimization of the use of aspirin: Balance between benefits and risks

Reduction of upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk with proton pump inhibitor therapy in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation receiving direct oral anticoagulant: A nationwide population-based cohort study