Abstract:Copyrighted works are greatly entwined with the concept of the sharing economy because of their status as informational public goods. Unlike commercial sharing models that address tangible goods such as bikes and houses, the sharing of which is limited by their physical nature, sharing models for intangible copyrighted works such as Google Books and live game webcasting must account for the comparatively unfettered ability for these to be shared. Accordingly, these models are more focused on exploiting such works to their full commercial potential. However, these sharing models are to a large extent based on the unauthorised exploitation of copyrighted works and will be unworkable if the related copyright issues cannot be solved. The interest that copyright owners have in exclusivity must thus be balanced with the public's interest in further exploitation of copyrighted works. Article 22 of the Copyright Law of China outlines an exhaustive list of copyright exceptions; such a restrictive list is incompatible with the sharing economy. The Chinese courts have realised this problem and have gone beyond the law in their judgments, taking a cue from their US counterparts. However, many of these decisions appear to be inconsistent with one another. To address the aforementioned problems, this paper examines the latest proposed amendment to the Copyright Law of China and proposes several legislative and judicial actions that could help promote the sharing economy. At the legislative level, enacting legislation based on a refined open-ended fair use model is necessary to promote the development of the sharing economy. At the judicial level, Chinese courts should employ the concept of transformative use to correctly interpret legislation based on the proposed open-ended model. With transformative use as the cornerstone of copyright policy, the public gains the freedom to share others’ works, participate in the innovation process, and create works with new value. Moreover, authors would retain an incentive to create works under such a legal regime because market substitution will not occur if a work is used for a different expressive purpose than that for which the work was originally created. Thus, a balance can be achieved between promoting the sharing economy and protecting the exclusivity of copyright in China.

The Unique Chinese Legal Approach to Online Ad Blocking: is It in the Right Direction?

Does China need competition law?

Impact of Innovation on Competition Law: from the Perspective of Ad-Blocking Applications

Impact of Innovation on Competition Law: from an Outcome-Oriented Approach to a Process-Orientation Approach

Critical Analysis of Liability of Internet Service Providers for Indirect Patent Infringement

Research on Product Blocking from an Antitrust Perspective

The mechanism for intellectual property protection under Chinese e-commerce law: more powerful than necessary

Introducing the Open Clause to Improve Copyright Flexibility in Cyberspace? Analysis and Commentary on the Proposed "Two-Step Test" in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, in Comparison with the EU and the US.

Legal Regulation Research on Internet Platform Blocking Behavior

Legal Regulation of Internet Platform Banning Behaviors

Selection and Construction of Copyright Filtering Obligations

Notice and Take Down: How the Shift from Copyright Law to Chinese E-Commerce Law Poses an Unnecessary Disturbance to E-Commerce

The New Right Limitation and Exception Rules in Chinese Copyright Law

Battle between ‘Long’ and ‘Short’ Videos: Fragmented Uses, Diversified Purposes, and the Evolution of China’s Copyright Limitation Rules in the AI Era

To Share is Fair: the Changing Face of China's Fair Use Doctrine in the Sharing Economy and Beyond.

On the Application of the Principle of Exhaustion of Distribution Rights in the Network Environment:A Review of European and American Adjudication Positions and China's Approach

Communication, Culture, and Governance in Asia | Toward Fragmented Platform Governance in China: Through the Lens of Alibaba and the Legal-Judicial System

Toward Fragmented Platform Governance In China: Through The Lens Of Alibaba And The Legal-Judicial System

A functionalist approach to a principled application of the General Clause of China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law in intellectual property cases

Liability of marketplaces for intellectual property rights infringement: the experience of the US and China

How to utilize notice-and-takedown procedures in IP enforcement on e-commerce platforms - a lesson from China