Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Gastric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era: Dosimetric Analysis, Clinical Outcome, and Long-term Quality of Life

X. Liu,Y. X. Li,Y. Tian,J. Jin,W. H. Wang,S. L. Wang,Y. W. Song,Y. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1704
2015-01-01
Abstract:Clinical and dosimetric benefits of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) have not been fully addressed, especially in the rituximab era. This retrospective study evaluated dosimetric parameters, treatment outcomes, toxicities, and quality of life (QOL) of IMRT for patients with localized PG-DLBCL. Forty-six patients with localized PG-DLBCL underwent IMRT after RCHOP or RCHOP-like chemotherapy (71.7% of patients had rituximab). Fifteen patients (38.5%) were classified as the germinal center B cell-like (GCB) subtype and 24 patients (61.6%) as the non-GCB subtype. Dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk were assessed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. At the last follow-up, patients alive without disease were invited to fill out the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire specified for stomach cancer (QLQ-C30-STO22). The median mean dose of PTV was 41.6 Gy. Only 0.16% and 0.73% of PTV received <90% and <95% of prescribed dose, respectively. Both dose conformity and homogeneity of PTV were good, with median conformity index (CI) of 0.87 and homogeneity index (HI) of 0.12, respectively. The median mean dose of the both kidneys, left kidney, right kidney, and liver was 12.2 Gy, 12.8 Gy, 12.2 Gy, and 16.7 Gy, respectively. The 5-year OS, PFS, and LRC rates for all patients were 80.2%, 77.2%, and 93.1%, respectively. Following chemotherapy, consolidation radiation therapy in patients with complete/partial response resulted in significantly better survival than salvage radiation therapy in patients with stable/progressive disease (OS and LRC: 90% and 97.4% vs 0% and 53.3%). The GCB subtype was related to superior OS (100% vs 62.2%, P = 0.009) and PFS (100% vs 55.6%, P = 0.015). One patient with chronic hepatitis B died of acute liver failure after 4cycles of RCHOP and 20.8Gy irradiation to liver in mean dose, and another patient with cryptogenic hepatic cirrhosis experienced grade 4 late liver dysfunction after 5 cycles of RCHOP and 22.9Gy irradiation to liver in mean dose. No other serious acute or late hepatic dysfunction, nephropathy, or gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. Thirty-three out of 35 patients (94.3%) who were alive without disease completed QLQ-C30-STO22. The global functional QOL score was 82, and all functional aspects were excellent with scores above 90. Most symptom scales were negligible with scores less than 10. IMRT achieves excellent target coverage and dose conformity. IMRT after RCHOP chemotherapy yielded favorable treatment outcomes with acceptable toxicities and good long-term QOL for localized PG-DLBCL patients, but it should be carefully delivered to patients with chronic liver diseases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?