Evaluation of Medication Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease on Clinical Evidence

Meng-qiu LI,Wen-wu ZHANG,Tao CHEN,Ling LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2014.03.009
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To formulate the best treatment plan for Alzheimer's disease patients by evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and side effect of various evidence-based programs. Methods Alzheimer's disease, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, memantine, rosiglitazone, etc. were defined as retrieval words. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were used with applying of manual searching. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials and case-observation studies were collected and evaluated by Jadad Scale. Results After screening, 33 selected resources included 14 systematic reviews, 14 randomized controlled trials, 4 controlled clinical trials and 1 case-observation study. According to Jadad Scale, total 28 articles were evaluated to be high quality (12 with score 4, 10 score 5, 6 score 7), and 5 were low quality with score 3. It was summarized as follows: 1) Alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disease for which no cure exists. To date, only symptomatic treatments with cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor noncompetitive antagonist (memantine), are effective and well tolerated to counterbalance the neurotransmitter disturbance, but cannot limit or impact on disease progression. 2) Disease modifying drug is an potential agent, with persistent effect on slowing the progression of structural damage, and can be detected even after withdrawing the treatment. Many types of disease modifying drugs are undergoing clinical trials. Conclusions Using evidence-based medicine methods can provide best clinical evidence on Alzheimer's disease treatment. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2014.03.009
What problem does this paper attempt to address?