Comparison of Online and Onsite Health Education Intervention in Preventing Sports Injury among College Students

Youqing Shen,Chengcai Xia,Huangdong Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000518048.97489.e5
2017-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE: To determine the effect and the superiority of online and onsite education intervention designed to improve perception and basic knowledge and skills of sports injury prevention among college students. METHODS: 2,088 college students were recruited from a cluster random sampling of 51 classes to acquire sports injuries epidemiology for the further intervention. 321 collected participations were randomly allocated to the online (n=157) and onsite (n=164) group. 4 educational sessions led by specialists were designed with the same topics in both groups. The components engaged in health awareness, basic knowledge, and enrichment activities targeting skills training. Students received prospective surveys incorporated 12 Likert scale questions. Differences within and between groups were compared using independent and paired T-test, respectively. SPSS18.0 was used for the statistical analyses and a significant level was set at P≤0.05. RESULTS: The rate of sports injuries was 15.4% (321/2088 students) on the retrospective survey. There were no differences between groups in awareness (online: 2.40±0.06 vs onsite 2.34±0.06, p=0.509) and knowledge and skills (online: 1.87±0.07 vs onsite 1.86±0.09, p=0.891) on the pre-intervention survey. Pre- and post-intervention data revealed improved awareness (online: pre- 2.40±0.06 vs post- 3.25±0.07, p=0.000; onsite: pre- 2.34±0.06 vs post- 3.45±0.07, p=0.000) and knowledge and skills (online: pre- 1.87±0.07 vs post- 2.37±0.07, p=0.000; onsite: pre- 1.86±0.09 vs post- 3.94±0.06, p=0.000) within both groups. Statistical tests indicated significantly difference between groups in knowledge and skills (online: 2.37±0.07 vs onsite 3.94±0.06, p=0.000), particularly with higher scores in onsite group, while no difference in awareness (online: 3.25±0.07 vs onsite 3.45±0.07, p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: limitations of perception and knowledge and skills of injury prevention may compromise the students’ ability to prevent sports injuries. Both online and onsite education may be attributed to heightened perception and basic knowledge and skills, while onsite education had priority to online format in improving fundament knowledge and skills in injury prevention among college students. Supported by the Hubei Science Education Project (2014B196 & 2016B155).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?