Long-acting PEGylated Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (jintrolong) for Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: Phase II and Phase III Multicenter, Randomized Studies
Xiaoping Luo,Ling Hou,Li Liang,Guanping Dong,Shuixian Shen,Zhuhui Zhao,Chun Xiu Gong,Yuchuan Li,Min-lian Du,Zhe Su,Hongwei Du,Chaoying Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-16-0905
2017-01-01
European Journal of Endocrinology
Abstract:Objective: We assessed the efficacy and safety of a weekly pegylated human growth hormone (PEG-rhGH) (Jintrolong) vs daily rhGH for children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).Design: Phase II and III, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trials.Methods: 108 and 343 children with treatment-naive GHD from 6 hospitals in China were enrolled in the phase II and III studies respectively. Patients in the phase II study were randomized 1:1:1 to weekly Jintrolong (0.1 mg/kg/week PEG-rhGH complex), weekly Jintrolong (0.2 mg/kg/week PEG-rhGH complex) or daily rhGH (0.25 mg/kg/week) for 25 weeks. Patients in the phase III study were randomized in a 2: 1 ratio to weekly Jintrolong (0.2 mg/kg/week) or daily rhGH (0.25 mg/kg/week) for 25 weeks. The primary endpoint for both studies was height velocity (HV) increase at the end of treatment. Other growth-related parameters, safety and compliance were also monitored.Results: The phase II study established the preliminary efficacy, safety and recommended dose of Jintrolong PEG-rhGH. In the phase III study, we demonstrated significantly greater HV increases in patients receiving Jintrolong treatment (from 2.26 +/- 0.87 cm/year to 13.41 +/- 3.72 cm/year) vs daily rhGH (from 2.25 +/- 0.82 cm/year to 12.55 +/- 2.99 cm/year) at the end of treatment (P < 0.05). Additionally, significantly greater improvement in the height standard deviation scores was associated with Jintrolong throughout the treatment (P < 0.05). Adverse event rates and treatment compliance were comparable between the two groups.Conclusion: Jintrolong PEG-rhGH at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/week for 25 weeks is effective and safe for GHD treatment and is non-inferior to daily rhGH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?