The Immediate Blood Pressure Lowering Effects of Acute Concurrent Exercise: A Meta-Analysis

Alyssa Jones,Lauren Ml Corso,Hayley V. MacDonald,Blair T. Johnson,Jill Livingston,Linda S. Pescatello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000516983.23635.01
2017-01-01
Abstract:Our recent meta-analysis on the blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of concurrent exercise training (CET) found systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were moderately reduced an average of ~3 mmHg overall. However, large SBP/DBP (~9/8 mmHg) reductions were noted among adults with hypertension, indicating the potential clinical utility of CET as antihypertensive lifestyle therapy. PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis to determine whether acute concurrent exercise (CE) is also efficacious antihypertensive lifestyle therapy. METHODS: Databases were searched for controlled studies that included: adults (≥19 yr), a single bout of CE, and measured BP pre- and post-CE and control. Analyses followed random-effects assumptions. RESULTS: 8 studies and 13 interventions (k) qualified. Subjects (N=109) were young to middle-aged (35.9±16.4 yr), overweight (26.7±3.1 kg/m2) men (34.6%) and women (65.4%) with a resting SBP/DBP of 122.3±11.9/76.6±7.2 mmHg. Among the total sample, 38.6% (N=42) had hypertension, 12.4% (N=14) prehypertension, and 49.0% (N=53) normal BP. Acute CE was performed at moderate-to-vigorous intensity (aerobic=65.6±17.5% maximum oxygen uptake, resistance=63.9±16.5% one-repetition maximum) for 55.0±6.1 min, with 53.9% of the interventions performing aerobic first. Aerobic exercise interventions included walking (38.5%, k=5), cycling (38.5%, k=4), running (15.4%, k=2), and step aerobics (7.7%, k=1) for 29.1±3.0 min. Dynamic resistance exercise interventions were performed on machines for 26.1±4.9 min, and consisted of 2.8±1.2 sets of 11.5±5.4 repetitions per set for 5.9±1.2 exercises. BP was measured in the laboratory for 89.2±45.4 min post-CE. Overall, acute CE elicited large reductions in SBP (d+ [95% CI]= -0.84 [-1.23, -0.44]; -9.2 mmHg), but not DBP (d+ [95% CI]= -0.08 [-0.27, 0.11]; -0.6 mmHg) compared to control. We observed significant heterogeneity for SBP (I2 [95% CI]= 82.7% [71.6%, 89.4%]) and DBP (I2 [95% CI]= 49.7% [4.9%, 73.43%]), but no significant moderators emerged. CONCLUSION: Similar to CET, acute CE leads to clinically meaningful reductions in SBP (~9 mmHg), but in contrast to CET, not DBP. The BP lowering patterns appear to differ between acute and chronic CE, findings that should be confirmed in future randomized CE trials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?