PC220 Angiotensin 1-7 Suppresses Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Gang Li,Baohui Xu,Hongping Deng,Anna Cabot,Hai Yuan,Xuejun Wu,Sara A. Michie,Ronald L. Dalman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.375
IF: 4.86
2017-01-01
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a chronic inflammatory disease, the pathogenesis of which remains incompletely defined. We and other investigators have demonstrated the critical importance of angiotensin (Ang) II and its cellular receptor AT1 in the development of experimental AAAs. Although Ang 1-7 and its receptor Mas counteract many cellular functions mediated by AT1, the role of the Ang 1-7/Mas pathway has not been investigated in this context. This study evaluated the influences of Ang 1-7 and its receptor Mas on the formation and progression of experimental AAAs. AAAs were created in 10- to 12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice via intra-aortic infusion of porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE). Mice were treated with Ang 1-7 (0.5 mg/kg/d via subcutaneous injection) beginning immediately before or 4 days after PPE infusion. Another cohort of mice were cotreated with Ang 1-7 and the Mas receptor antagonist A779 (0.5 mg/kg/day) beginning immediately before PPE infusion. Control mice were treated with equal amounts of vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline) in identical regimens. Influences on AAA formation and progression were evaluated by serial assessment of aortic diameter in vivo and aortic histology at sacrifice. The Fig summarizes major influences of the Ang 1-7/Mas receptor pathway on aneurysm formation, progression, and histopathology. In ultrasound imaging at 14 days, Ang 1-7 treatment initiated immediately following aneurysm creation substantially suppressed aortic enlargement compared to vehicle treatment. Histologically, Ang 1-7 treatment was associated with attenuation of aortic medial elastin and smooth muscle cell depletion, mural macrophage, CD4+, CD8+ T- and B-cell density and neoangiogenesis. Cotreatment with the Ang 1-7 receptor Mas antagonist A779 “rescued” the aneurysm phenotype. Additionally, Ang 1-7 treatment initiated even 4 days following AAA creation was still effective in limiting further aneurysmal enlargement and pathologic evolution. Ang 1-7 treatment, initiated either at or up to 4 days following AAA initiation limits further progression of experimental AAAs. This inhibitory effect seems likely related to activation of the Mas receptor. These results suggest that either Ang 1-7 or alternative Mas receptor agonists may have clinical utility in suppressing progression of early AAA disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?