Clarifying Member Personality Influences on Team Effectiveness: Toward a Social Network Approach
Ning Li,Brad Harris,Helen Hailin Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.11863abstract
2017-01-01
Academy of Management Proceedings
Abstract:Researchers have long sought to disentangle how team composition, including members’ personality attributes, affects team effectiveness. Interestingly, research has insofar largely employed simple team averages or single member attribute ratings (e.g., high, low, or median scores) of a particular attribute (e.g., conscientiousness) without empirically accounting for members’ unique network positions. Social network theory, however, suggests that a team member who occupies a central (versus peripheral) position in a team network can potentially have a disproportionate impact on the team outcomes. Accordingly, we develop and empirically test a new model whereby team members’ personality (i.e., conscientiousness, openness, agreeableness, and extraversion) affects team effectiveness (i.e., performance and viability) differentially based on one’s network positioning. Data from 658 team members nested in 87 teams reveal that a member with the highest personality scores on particular Big Five dimensions tends to have a stronger effect on team effectiveness when s/he is in a central rather than peripheral network position (the effect is even stronger than the average influence of all other teammates’ personality). In doing so, this research supports a minority influence (Grant & Patil, 2012) thesis regarding the disproportional effect of certain individual members’ personality on team effectiveness.