Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Hemodialysis: How Chinese Patients Choose their Dialysis Modality?

Xin Wang,Xin-Hong Lu
2006-01-01
Indian Journal of Peritoneal dialysis
Abstract:Peritoneal dialysis (PD) penetration rate is rather low in China despite its simplicity, effectiveness and lower cost as compared to hemodialysis (HI)). In the present study, we investigated how Chinese dialysis patients selected their dialysis modalities. Methods: From November to December 31M, 2002, a questionnaire survey was performed in the First Hospital of Peking University. We tried to include all the prevalent dialysis patients from the hemodialysis unit and the peritoneal dialy sis unit. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire during their HD sessions (for HD patients) or during their monthly clinic visits (for PD patients). Results: 83 HD patients and 88 PD patients returned their questionnaires. Among the 83 HD patients, five were transferred from PD, twenty patients had never heard about PD. In the remaining 52 HD patients: selection was made by doctors in 9, PD was believed to be more troublesome in 19, lack of family supports in 8, concerns over the efficiency of PI) therapy in 8, waiting for kidney transplantation in 5, abdominal operation in 1, polycystic kidney disease in 1. and fear of peritonitis in 1 patients. All the 88 PI) patients knew about HD. Among them, 21 patients were transferred from HD, 48 were considered not to be suitable for HD by doctors because of various comorbidities. The remaining 19 PD patients believed that PD had many advantages such as convenience, safe and better quality of life and therefore chose PD as their first options. Conclusions: Our study showed that the selection of dialysis modality among Chinese ESRD patient has been biased against PI) treatment. Improving patient and professional education of PD therapy and improving PD technologies will increase the use of PD in China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?