The Efficacy and Efficiency of Half Frozen Section Assessment of Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Retrospective Analysis of 1116 Cases.

Houpu Yang,Shu Wang,Jiajia Guo,Yingming Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.1055
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:1055 Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy became the standard of care for the staging of clinically negative axillary lymph node in patients with invasive breast cancer. Surgeons often request intra-operative frozen section assessment of SLN to guide treatment decision during the operation. This study was to assess whether this protocol was accurate and efficient. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pathology records for consecutive breast cancer patients with frozen section of SLNB examined from 2012 to 2014. We defined paraffin section diagnosis as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, and false positive rate were calculated. The waiting time for frozen section analysis was record. Results: In total, 1116 cases involved frozen section evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes. The sensitivity, specificity of frozen section was 79.9%, 99.6% respectively. In 49 cases (20.1% of positive patients), the SLN was called negative during the intra-operative evaluation but positive on final examination (false negative). Furthermore, in another 3 patients, malignancy was only detected on frozen but not on paraffin sections (false positive). The waiting time for frozen diagnosis, unnecessary for true negative patients (77.8%), was 51±17 minutes, which is approximately 1.5 times the duration of a secondary axillary dissection (33±15). Only 17.4% patients from intra-operative half frozen section assessment. Conclusions: We do not recommend intra-operative frozen section to guide further axillary surgery, as the protocol of freezing half of SLN is not an accurate or an efficient method, with a relatively high false negative rate and some false positive cases which might make the axillary staging complicated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?