Three‐dimensional evaluation framework of hazard–exposure–vulnerability for mapping heatwave risk and associated dominant dimensions in China
Jinping Liu,Tongchang Zhang,Yanqun Ren,Patrick Willems,Ali Mirchi,Arfan Arshad,Tie Liu,Quoc Bao Pham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8628
2024-09-22
International Journal of Climatology
Abstract:The spatiotemporal patterns of heatwave risk in China were unveiled by a robust three‐dimensional evaluation framework of hazard–exposure–vulnerability, as well as their dominant contributing dimensions in the different regions, such as hazard; exposure; vulnerability; hazard and exposure; hazard and vulnerability; exposure and vulnerability; or hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. In the context of global warming, the frequency, intensity, and duration of heatwave events have markedly increased, bearing profound implications for both natural ecosystems and human societies. To effectively cope with this challenge, it is imperative to accurately identify and comprehensively assess the risks posed by heatwaves. This study undertakes a systematic approach and robust methodology to assess heatwave risks by leveraging a diverse array of data sources—encompassing remote sensing, statistical analyses. The methodology integrates the risk triangle theory alongside established risk assessment frameworks laid out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Employing a three‐dimensional evaluation framework encompassing hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, we unravel spatial–temporal patterns, high‐risk zones, and dominant dimensions of heatwave risks contributing to potential disasters. Results indicated that during 1999–2008, roughly 27% of the study areas were affected by high and above risk levels of heatwaves, and the areas with high and very high hazard, exposure, and vulnerability accounted for approximately 19.5%, 10%, and 32.5%, respectively. During 2009–2018, the proportion of areas with high and very high risk, hazard, and exposure increased to about 31%, 26%, and 14%, respectively, while the percentage of areas with high and very high vulnerability decreased to about 24.43%. Notably, Xinjiang and the western part of Northwestern China are characterized by hazard‐dominant conditions, while Southern China's risk profile has shifted from 1999–2008 to 2009–2018 from high hazard and vulnerability conditions to a more complex interaction involving hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Moreover, Northern China and the northern segment of Southwestern China exhibit simultaneous high‐risk rankings across hazard, exposure, and vulnerability dimensions, forming a comprehensive high‐risk zone. These findings characterize heatwave risk patterns and offer critical insights for risk management decisions, guiding effective disaster prevention and relief measures to ensure socio‐economic stability and public health.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences