Feed Management for Pacific White Shrimp Litopenaeus Vannamei under Semi-Intensive Conditions in Tanks and Ponds

To Pham Thi Ha Van,Melanie A. Rhodes,Yangen Zhou,D. Allen Davis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13348
2017-01-01
Aquaculture Research
Abstract:To improve feed management strategies for the semi-intensive culture of Litopenaeus vannamei, outdoor tank and pond trials were conducted. In the tank trial, shrimp (35shrimp/m(2), n=4) were offered feed for 6weeks based on a standard feeding protocol (SFP, designed as T100) with five variations (T80:90:100, T90, T90:100, T100:110, T110) of this protocol produced by varying the feed inputs and expressing the treatments as a percentage. Results demonstrated no significant differences in survival rate and feed conversion ratio (FCR) among treatments. The mean final weight and final biomass in the treatments T100:110 and T110 were significantly higher than those in treatment T90 but were not different from the other treatments. In the pond trial, juvenile shrimp (28shrimp/m(2), n=4) were stocked into twelve 0.1-ha ponds over a 16-week period. Three feeding protocols were evaluated including a SFP, a 10% reduction in the SFP (SFP:90), and a variable feed input (SFP:80:90:100), which included 80% SFP at week 4th-8th, 90% SFP from week 9th-12th and 100% SFP for week 12th-16th. There were no significant differences in growth performance and economic return among treatments. Based on previous studies, in which higher feed inputs were evaluated, and results of this study, it does not appear to be economically beneficial to use high feed inputs. Instead, feed input could be either applied at a standard ration to optimize growth and economic return or at restricted rations to reduce FCR (feed cost) albeit at the expense of some growth.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?