A Network Efficiency Analysis Approach to Habitat Network Optimization: a Case Study of the Little Egret (egretta Garzetta) in the Su-Xi-Chang Area, China

WU Wei,FAN Shiwei,OU Minghao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201603270551

2017-01-01

Acta Ecologica Sinica

Abstract:The network efficiency analysis method is used to study network systematization and integrity, which are important for the assessment of ecological networks. However, this method has rarely been applied in habitat network optimization studies. The objective of the present study was to use the network efficiency analysis method to develop a new approach to optimize habitat network analysis. A small⁃scale area of 1.75 × 10 km was selected in the Su⁃Xi⁃Chang region as the case study; and 12 neighboring cities, together with the Su⁃Xi⁃Chang area, covering 11.91 × 10 km, were selected as the large⁃scale study area. The little egret (Egretta garzetta) was chosen as a regionally representative species in the study area. The method included three steps: 1) a conceptual framework for the network efficiency analysis was built to optimize the habitat network, in which the small⁃world and scale⁃free network concepts were introduced, with their network structural characteristics, which included average path length, cluster coefficients, and the probability distributions of node degrees. These structural characteristics were applied in step 3 as the assessment indicators; 2) the little egret habitat htt p:/ /w ww .ec olo gic a.c n http: / / www.ecologica.cn patches and small⁃ and large⁃scale habitat networks were identified and simulated. The present status of the small⁃scale habitat network was obtained from previous research results. In the large⁃scale area analysis, the observation sites were obtained from a dataset for 2003—2015 on the China Bird Report website. These were regarded as the habitats and those sites where > 20 little egrets were observed simultaneously were identified and transferred to habitat patches. Then, a large⁃ scale habitat network was simulated using the same method used in the previous research; and 3) the present status of the small⁃scale habitat network was optimized using the large⁃scale habitat network and was designated as network A. Network B was generated by adjusting the network A structure and transferring its network structural characteristics. The network connectivity indexes α, β, and γ of the present status small⁃scale habitat network were used to calculate and compare networks A and B. The results showed that 1) the A and B networks represented the optimized results of the present status small⁃scale habitat network; 2) the increased average path length value, decreased cluster coefficient value, and increased goodness⁃of⁃fit of probability distribution of node degree for network B compared to that of network A showed that the network B small⁃world network characteristics had decreased, but its scale⁃free network characteristics had increased. This suggests that network B has a better fit to the large⁃scale habitat network than network A; and 3) the number of newly⁃ added habitat nodes and the migration corridor for network B were smaller than network A, but its corresponding values for the network connectivity indexes α, β, and γ were greater. This suggests that network B results were better than those for network A, and therefore are the recommended, optimized results. The present study indicated that optimizing habitat networks using the network efficiency analysis method improved effectiveness, enriched network structure optimization methodology, and provided a theoretical basis for improved goodness⁃of⁃fit when undertaking spatial planning among upper⁃ and lower⁃levels. However, further studies are required to improve conceptual frameworks, including aspects of network hierarchical analysis, scaling, and network quality assessment indicators.