Abstract:Purpose: This study aimed to explore the effect of biomaterials with different stiffness on Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADSC)–macrophage crosstalk in bone tissue engineering and its role in bone repair. Methods: Biomaterials with Young's modulus of 64 and 0.2 kPa were selected, and the crosstalk between ADSCs and macrophages was investigated by means of conditioned medium treatment and cell co-culture, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the polarization of macrophages. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alizarin red staining (ARS) solutions were used to evaluate the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs. Transwell assay was used to evaluate the chemotaxis of ADSCs and macrophages. Moreover, mass spectrometry proteomics was used to analyze the secreted protein profile of ADSCs of different substrates and macrophages in different polarization states. Results: On exploring the influence of biomaterials on macrophages from ADSCs on different substrates, we found that CD163 and CD206 expression levels in macrophages were significantly higher in the 64-kPa group than in the 0.2-kPa group in conditioned medium treatment and cell co-culture. Flow cytometry showed that more cells became CD163 + or CD206 + cells in the 64-kPa group under conditioned medium treatment or cell co-culture. The Transwell assay showed that more macrophages migrated to the lower chamber in the 64-kPa group. The proteomic analysis found that ADSCs in the 64-kPa group secreted more immunomodulatory proteins, such as LBP and RBP4, to improve the repair microenvironment. On exploring the influence of biomaterials on ADSCs from macrophages in different polarization states, we found that ALP and ARS levels in ADSCs were significantly higher in the M2 group than in the other three groups (NC, M0, and M1 groups) in both conditioned medium treatment and cell co-culture. The Transwell assay showed that more ADSCs migrated to the lower chamber in the M2 group. The proteomic analysis found that M2 macrophages secreted more extracellular remodeling proteins, such as LRP1, to promote bone repair. Conclusion: In bone tissue engineering, the stiffness of repair biomaterials can affect the crosstalk between ADSCs and macrophages, thereby regulating local repair immunity and affecting bone repair.

Biomaterial stiffness determines stem cell fate

Substrate Stiffness Alters Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Cardiomyocyte Differentiation and Maturation

Nucleoskeletal Stiffness Regulates Stem Cell Migration and Differentiation Through Lamin A/C

Material Stiffness in Cooperation with Macrophage Paracrine Signals Determines the Tenogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mechanism of regulation of stem cell differentiation by matrix stiffness

Effects Of Matrix Stiffness On The Morphology, Adhesion, Proliferation And Osteogenic Differentiation Of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Integrative Analysis Reveals the Diverse Effects of 3D Stiffness Upon Stem Cell Fate

Manipulation of Stem Cells Fates: The Master and Multifaceted Roles of Biophysical Cues of Biomaterials

Regulating Osteogenesis and Adipogenesis in Adipose‐derived Stem Cells by Controlling Underlying Substrate Stiffness

Mechanical Properties of Materials for Stem Cell Differentiation

Effects of Matrix Stiffness on the Differentiation of Multipotent Stem Cells

The Regulation of Tendon Stem Cell Distribution, Morphology, and Gene Expression by the Modulus of Microfibers.

Adipogenesis or osteogenesis: destiny decision made by mechanical properties of biomaterials

Biomaterial Stiffness Guides Cross-talk Between Chondrocytes: Implications for a Novel Cellular Response in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Extracellular matrix stiffness as an energy metabolism regulator drives osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells

The Substrate Stiffness at Physiological Range Significantly Modulates Vascular Cell Behavior.

Osteogenesis-Related Behavior of MC3T3-E1 Cells on Substrates with Tunable Stiffness.

A polymer canvas with the stiffness of the bone matrix to study and control mesenchymal stem cell response

Thermally Responsive Microfibers Mediated Stem Cell Fate Via Reversibly Dynamic Mechanical Stimulation

The Effect of Matrix Stiffness on the Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Substrate stiffness can affect the crosstalk between adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages in bone tissue engineering