Abstract:Abstract Introduction Radical prostatectomy remains one of the gold standard treatments for localized prostate cancer, the most prevalent solid organ cancer in men. Surgical management of prostate cancer has been theorized to increase the risk of developing Peyronie’s Disease (PD). In 2010, Drs. Tal and Mulhall’s team characterized the incidence of PD in a cohort of 1011 men after radical prostatectomy to be 13.7% at 2 years and 15.9% at 3 years of follow-up. These numbers, significantly higher than estimates in the general population, which range from 0.5 to 7.1% (Sharma et al., Sex Med Rev 2020;8:314–23), suggest radical prostatectomy is a risk factor for developing PD. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of PD among post-prostatectomy patients who undergo a formal multi-modal penile rehabilitation program that includes mechanical and pharmacologic interventions to promote penile smooth muscle activation after surgery. Methods In this retrospective, descriptive study we reviewed the charts of 581 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), and were engaged in a penile rehabilitation program from January 2016 through January 2019. At our institution, patients scheduled for prostatectomy are referred preoperatively to an academic Men’s Health clinic to start a multi-modal program and follow up regularly for evaluation of sexual health. The program includes daily tadalafil, L-citrulline, and VED use (Table 1). Patients refractory to these therapies had the option to increase tadalafil dosing or undergo further treatment with intracavernosal injections at ~3 months post-op. We excluded patients who had PD pre-operatively or who did not have post-operative follow-up with the providers at this institution. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of PD among this cohort. Secondary outcome included time to development or diagnosis of PD. Results 581 patients with prostate cancer treated with RALP engaged in penile rehabilitation and were included in this analysis. The median age of men was 62.6 y with additional demographics listed in Table 2. The incidence of PD in this cohort was 2.9% (17 patients) with a median follow-up of 21.4 mo (IQR 2.8 – 55.8 mo). The diagnosis of PD was made at a median of 28.7 mo (IQR 20 – 36 mo) after prostatectomy. The 17 patients with PD had a median follow-up of 38.9 mo (IQR 23.2 – 55.8 mo). Conclusions In this cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with RALP and undergoing a consistent, multi-modal penile rehabilitation program, the incidence of PD was 2.9%, and median time to diagnosis was 28.7 months. This is the first study to assess PD incidence in men who engage in mechanical and pharmacologic penile rehabilitation at time of RALP. Furthermore, diagnosis of PD was made more than two years after surgery; this warrants further evaluation on whether penile rehabilitation prevents PD. This retrospective analysis is a hypothesis-generating study that should inspire further research on the role of regular mechanical stimulation or daily PDE-5 inhibitors in delaying or preventing PD after pelvic surgery. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo Scientific.

PS-05-001 Comparison Between Penile Rehabilitation (PR) and Sexual Rehabilitation (SR) in Patients after Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy (NSRP): Pilot Study

Efficacy of a preprostatectomy multi-modal penile rehabilitation regimen on recovery of postoperative erectile function

(014) Expectations of Patients and Their Partners After Penile Rehabilitation Programs After Nerve-Sparing Prostatectomy: Are There Relevant Differences?

(153) Penile Rehabilitation After Nerve-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Data Of A Prospective Feasibility Study

(333) Sexual Function Recovery Following Open And Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Results Of An Academic Penile Rehabilitation Program

(013) How do Sexual Medicine Specialists Handle Patient Counseling and Penile Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (ralp): Trends in Pre Op and Post Operative Management

[Pre- and post-prostatectomy rehabilitation by the certified nurse-urologist pair (REHAB): Feasibility study]

Generating comprehensive comparative evidence on various interventions for penile rehabilitation in patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

A comparison of different oral therapies versus no treatment for erectile dysfunction in 196 radical nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy patients

Sexual Rehabilitation After Treatment for Prostate Cancer-Part 1: Recommendations From the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015)

(012) Incidence of Peyronie’s Disease After Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients Undergoing Penile Rehabilitation Regimen

Penile Rehabilitation after Radical Prostatectomy: Patients' Attitude and Feasibility in China.

Regenerative technology to restore and preserve erectile function in men following prostate cancer treatment: evidence for penile rehabilitation in the context of prostate cancer survivorship

Assessing vacuum erectile devices effect on post‐radical prostatectomy erectile function

Intermediate-Term Oncological Outcome Assessment for Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Comparing Retzius Sparing to Standard Approach in a Randomized Control Cohort

Selective Resection of Dorsal Nerves of Penis for Premature Ejaculation.

Penile Rehabilitation with Vacuum Erection Device for Erectile Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy

Sexual counseling improved erectile rehabilitation after non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy or cystectomy--results of a randomized prospective study

The Effect of Single-port Transvesical Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy on Erectile Function and Urinary Continence Compared to Intrafascial Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy

(153) Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with the Simultaneous Implant of a Penile Prosthesis: Penile Length Preservation After 10 years Follow Up

Erectile response profiles of men using PDE5 inhibitors combined with intracavernosal injections as part of a penile rehabilitation program after radical prostatectomy