China And Estonia In Flux: Is This A Valid Basis For Comparison Of Their Approaches To Change Management?
ruth alas,Sudi Sharifi,wei sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.62.2.11605
2009-01-01
Abstract:In this paper we attempt to analyze management of organizational change in the context of economic and commercial reforms in the former centrally planned economic systems. Developing and transitional economies have intended to dispose of their past 'blue prints' and seek out templates which have been successful in the existing market economies. At the core of our questioning is the accepted idea that the process of organizational change in transitional and emerging economies is and needs to be 'managed'. In this paper the processes of organizational change in two distinct cultures, China and Estonia, has been analyzed drawing partially on an institutional perspective.To compare the implementation of change in selected organizations in China and Estonia, we conducted structured interviews with members of top management teams in 160 companies in several large cities in the northern part of China: Bejiing, Tianjin, Jinan and Zibo; and in 243 Estonian companies. In Estonia, the interviews were carried out at two different periods: first in 2001 (137 companies) and second in 2005 (106 companies). In both countries the companies (the sample) were selected from a cross section of industries and sectors, ranging from manufacturing and technology, banking and insurance organizations, to those in energy and education industries.Results indicate that in Chinese organizations people tended to be more accepting changes than in Estonian companies, but in a passive manner. The most frequently used strategy for overcoming resistance to change in both countries was communication and education. But Estonian managers attached more importance to empowering and involving employees and training them for the changes than the Chinese managers.In order to explane these results the authors apply institutionalism. China and Estonia are greatly influenced by socialist/communist ideologies. Estonia had a long history of socialism before its independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991. Likewise, since the founding of China in 1949, China has been under socialist regime for over half a century. A socialist society in this context is characterized by high formalization, centralization and totalitarianism. Estonia has been building democracy for the past 15 years. But in China the level of democracy has not been high. Although China experienced successful transformation of economic regime, the political system in China has remained within its specific version of socialism and operated on the basis of centralized power. There are fundamental and conflicting ways in which individuals have been trained to think and act under totalitarianism system.In Estonian companies management is more democratic, employees' views are sought and in order to encourage employees to accept and support changes, some measures are taken, e.g. communicating with the employees, the likely benefits brought by the changes and improving employees' welfare. As in China relationship between people is the priority, in the process of change, complicated relation network has to be taken into consideration.