The Differential Role of Human Cationic Trypsinogen (PRSS1) R122H Mutation in Hereditary and Non-Hereditary Chronic Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cheng Hu,Li Wen,Lihui Deng,Chenlong Zhang,Aurelia Lugea,Hsin-Yuan Su,Richard Waldron,Stephen J. Pandol,Qing Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(17)32551-9
IF: 29.4
2017-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Background: Colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for prevention of colorectal cancer by detecting its precursor lesion, adenomas.However, several studies have reported an adenoma miss rate of 10-25% despite technical improvements in endoscopic techniques.Endocuff is a device with flexible arms that is attached to the tip of the endoscope and has been proposed to improve adenoma detection rate (ADR).However, given the larger size of the endoscope tip with the device, there is concern about successful cecal and ileal intubation in endocuffassisted colonoscopy (EAC) when compared to conventional colonoscopy (CC).Further, ADR of right colonic adenomas and serrated adenomas were reported in several randomized studies with inconsistent results.We aimed to do a meta-analysis of randomized clinical studies to evaluate these factors.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in EMBASE, Scopus, Pubmed, Cochrane databases from 1946 to November 30, 2016 to identify potential articles.MeSH headings included in the search included Endocuff, cecum, ileum, serrated adenoma, serrated polyp, serrated polyposis, adenoma detection rate, and colonoscopy.All references from the identified articles were further searched to find more articles.Abstracts published from major gastroenterology meetings including the American College of Gastroenterology meeting Digestive Disease week and United European Gastroenterology were also searched up to November 2016.Statistics were done using MedCalc version 16.8.4.Results: A total of 87 articles were identified from the search strategy and from articles identified through references and abstracts.Results are included in Table 1.There were no statistically significant differences in cecal intubation rate and ileal intubation rate between EAC and CC.EAC was observed to be better than CC for ADR of right colon adenomas.However, no difference was observed in the ADR of serrated adenomas between the two groups.Conclusion: EAC and CC were observed to have similar cecal and ileal intubation rates.EAC appeared to improve right colon ADR when compared to CC. Serrated adenoma ADR was not different between the two groups.Further randomized studies comparing serrated adenoma detection rate between EAC and CC along with cost-effectiveness analysis between the two techniques would provide more information about the utility of Endocuff in standard practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?