PD52-02 RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ASSOCIATED WITH XP11.2 TRANSLOCATION/TFE3 GENE FUSIONS: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ON CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND

Zhang Fan,Wang Wei,Gan Weidong,Guo Hongqian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2190
IF: 7.6
2017-01-01
The Journal of Urology
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Epidemiology & Evaluation/Staging III1 Apr 2017PD52-02 RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ASSOCIATED WITH XP11.2 TRANSLOCATION/TFE3 GENE FUSIONS: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ON CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND Zhang Fan, Wang Wei, Gan Weidong, and Guo Hongqian Zhang FanZhang Fan More articles by this author , Wang WeiWang Wei More articles by this author , Gan WeidongGan Weidong More articles by this author , and Guo HongqianGuo Hongqian More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2190AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the significance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusions (Xp11.2 RCC) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the conventional ultrasound (CUS) and CEUS data of 15 cases proved to be Xp11.2 RCC and 72 cases proved to be CCRCC by pathology after surgery. RESULTS Xp11.2 RCC more frequently affected young (32.3± 12.6 years) women (9/15, 60%) with gross hematuria (7/15, 46.7%), while CCRCC more frequently involved middle-aged (51.0 ± 14.1 years) men (47/72, 65.3%). In CUS, both Xp11.2 RCC and CCRCC tended to be quasiccircular and hypo-echoic. Lesion sizes between Xp11.2 RCC (4.6±1.6 cm) and CCRCC (5.0±1.8 cm) were unsignificant difference. In CEUS, the arrival time (AT) and time to peak intensity (TTP) of most Xp11.2 RCCs (12/15, 80%) were slower than adjacent renal cortex, while AT and TTP of most CCRCCs (52/72 80.6%) were faster than adjacent renal cortex. The difference of peak intensity (PI) between Xp11.2 RCC(hypo-enhancement 9/15, 60%) and CCRCC (hyper-enhancement 53/72, 73.6%) were significant. Contrast agent in most CCRCCs (48/72, 66.7%) was rapid-fading, but all of Xp11.2 RCCs were rapid-fading, there was significant difference between them. CONCLUSIONS CEUS provide a new and effective method in diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC. CEUS are useful in differential diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC with CCRCC. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e989 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Zhang Fan More articles by this author Wang Wei More articles by this author Gan Weidong More articles by this author Guo Hongqian More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?