Abstract:Intracoronary stenting has been shown to have better immediate and long-term clinical outcomes and less restenosis than standard balloon angioplasty. However, the benefit was achieved at the cost of higher rates of coronary thrombosis, bleeding complications, the need for anticoagulation, and longer hospital stay. For the latter reasons there is a tendency to replace the anticoagulants by antiplatelet agents alone after stenting. However, we prospectively monitored 150 consecutive patients (133 men, 17 women, mean age 58.5 years) from two centers since February 1993. They all had coronary artery disease and underwent percutaneous implantation of non-heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz coronary stents under a full but lower dose of anticoagulation. The femoral approach was used in all patients except one. In the 150 patients, 200 stents were implanted in 165 target arteries with 172 lesions. Stenting was performed without the guidance of intravascular ultrasonography; high-pressure poststenting inflation was used in only 17.3% of patients with less than optimal angiographic results. Coronary angiography was performed at baseline, immediately after the procedure, and after 6 months (mean 207 ± 53.6 days SD) of stenting. The mean (±SD) coronary minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.52 0.31 mm to 3.13 ± 0.42 mm immediately after stenting was performed and was 2.12 ± 0.91 mm at 6 months. There was a 0% subacute thrombosis rate and a 0% femoral bleeding complication rate in the whole series. Only three (2%) major events occurred: one Q-wave myocardial infarction from closure of an angioplasty site distal to the stent on a very long lesion, one cerebrovascular accident, and one noncoronary-related death. The only patient who underwent the brachial approach had hematoma; otherwise no other minor event occurred. The mean hospital stay was 4.5 days in one of the two study centers. The long-term clinical follow-up rate was 97.3%. The mean (±SD) clinical follow-up period was 589 ± 363 days. Clinical symptoms improved; the percentage of patients who had angina according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional class II, III, and IV was 31.3%, 44.7%, and 4%, respectively, before stenting was performed and was reduced to 4.7%, 3.7%, and 0%, respectively at 6-month follow-up after stenting was performed. The 6-month angiographic restudy rate was 90.6%, and the restenosis rate was 18.3%. In contrast to other reported series, these results support the idea that with careful puncture technique and meticulous postoperative wound care, intracoronary stenting can be successfully performed with the patient under full anticoagulation without major risks of bleeding and femoral vascular complications. Furthermore with a full but comparatively lower dose of anticoagulation, subacute thrombotic complications can be reduced to 0% even with non-heparin-coated stents without the use of intravascular ultrasound guidance and without the use of adjunctive high-pressure poststenting inflation in most patients. The restenosis rate and long-term clinical outcomes remained very favorable.

Thrombosis rate is higher with bioresorbable scaffolds than metallic stents, study finds

Bioresorbable scaffolds vs. drug-eluting stents for patients with myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Bioresorbable scaffolds vs. drug-eluting stents on short- and mid-term target lesion outcomes in patients after PCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bio-resorbable polymer stents: a review of material progress and prospects

Bioresorbable Scaffold: The Emerging Reality and Future Directions

Mid-to-long term clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in coronary artery diseases: a meta-analysis of 7321 patients

Mid- And Long-Term Outcome Comparisons Of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold During ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

Long-Term Effects of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents on Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes of 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bioresorbable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Fully Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials on Clinical Outcomes of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Three-year Clinical Outcomes of a Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold (XINSORB) and a Metallic Stent to Treat Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Interventional Cardiology: Lessons Learnt and Future Perspectives

[Research Progress of Bioresorbable Scaffold].

A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.

No Subacute Thrombosis and Femoral Bleeding Complications under Full Anticoagulation in 150 Consecutive Patients Receiving Non-Heparin-coated Intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz Stents

Coronary Bioresorbable metallic stents:Advancements and future perspectives

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

Current perspectives on bioresorbable scaffolds in coronary intervention and other fields