Molecular Markers in Malignant Melanoma: Experience at an Nci-Designated Cancer Center

Matthew R. Zibelman,Nandini Kulkarni,Miriam Lango,Margaret von Mehren,Sujana Movva,Karen S. Gustafson,Sanjay S. Reddy,Hong Wu,Jeffrey M. Farma,Anthony J. Olszanski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e20082
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e20082 Background: As knowledge of the molecular make-up of malignant melanoma (MM) evolves, multi-gene panel testing by next generation sequencing (NGS) is an increasingly important tool to uncover actionable mutations and provide prognostic information. Given the plethora of FDA-approved and investigational drugs which target specific pathways, NGS may enhance potential treatment options. Methods: Archived tumor samples from patients with high-risk and recurrent MM were analyzed for mutations in targeted regions of 50 cancer-related genes using a NGS platform. The mutational profiles of MM samples were summarized for all patients and correlated with notable clinicopathologic features. Results: MM samples from 60 patients were included. Median age was 71 years (range 28-90) and 66.7% were male (n = 40). A total of 101 mutations affecting 25 unique genes were found. Two or more mutations were found in 43.3% (n = 26) of MM while 13.3% (n = 8) of MM had no genetic alterations identified. The most common mutations included: NRAS (33.3%, n = 20), BRAF (30.0%, n = 18), p53 (23.3%, n = 14), and CDKN2A (11.7%, n = 7). BRAFV600 accounted for 88.9% (16/18) of all BRAF mutations, of which 87.5% were BRAFV600E(14/16). Potentially actionable mutations with commercially available drugs (BRAF, KIT, NRAS) were found in 68.3% of patients (n = 41), while another 21 genes could be targetable on a clinical trial. Twelve patients had either an acral (n = 7) or mucosal (n = 5) MM, of which 58.3% (n = 7) had no identifiable mutation. Of the 48 remaining patients, only one had no mutations (2.1%). One patient with metastatic cutaneous melanoma had a GNAS mutation discovered but did not have a history of ocular melanoma. Conclusions: Multi-gene targeted panel testing by NGS reveals a significant number of actionable mutations in patients with MM. Patients with non-cutaneous MM were less likely to have identifiable mutations. Gene mutation MM Samples with mutations (n) Percentage of total MM samples (n=60) NRAS 20 33.3 BRAFV600 16 26.7 TP53 14 23.3 CDKN2A 7 11.7 PTEN 5 8.3 CTNNB1 4 6.7 KRAS 4 6.7 KIT 3 5.0 EGFR 3 5.0 FLT3 3 5.0 BRAFNon-V600 2 3.3 RB1 2 3.3 ERBB4 2 3.3 FGFR3 2 3.3 ATM 2 3.3 KDR 2 3.3 Others (HRAS, SMAD4, FBXW7, PIK3CA, FGFR2, HNF1A, CSF1R, GNAS, PDGFR, APC) 10 16.7
What problem does this paper attempt to address?