A Multinational, Randomized, Phase Iii Trial of Xeliri with or Without Bevacizumab Versus Folfiri with or Without Bevacizumab As Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Safety Analysis of Asian Xeliri Project (Axept)

Masato Nakamura,Tae Won Kim,Rui-hua Xu,Young Suk Park,Yong Sang Hong,Tao Zhang,Takeshi Kato,Sang Hee Cho,Wei Wang,Hiroshi Matsuoka,Sae-Won Han,Yanhong Deng,Akitaka Makiyama,Keun-Wook Lee,Yi Ba,Mitsuyoshi Ota,Satoru Iwasa,Satoshi Morita,Yasuhide Yamada,Kei Muro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.681
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:681 Background: Several studies have shown that capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI) has promising efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. AXEPT is a non-inferiority, phase III comparison of XELIRI with or without bevacizumab vs 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with or without bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: We undertook an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized phase III trial in South Korea, China and Japan. Patients were randomized 1:1 to XELIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks in a 3-week cycle) with or without bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg or FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: From December 2013 to August 2015, 650 patients were enrolled and 625 (311 in FOLFIRI and 314 in XELIRI) were included to safety analysis at the cutoff dates on August 31, 2016. Patient baseline characteristics including KRAS status and UGT1A1 gene polymorphism were similar between the two treatment arms. Prior chemotherapy with oxaliplatin was given to 97.4% in both arms. The overall incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was 73% in FOLFIRI arm and 53.2% in XELIRI arm. Whereas FOLFIRI was associated with more grade 3-4 neutropenia (43.7% vs 16.2%), leucopenia (13.5% vs 7.3%) and all grades anemia (80.4% vs 69.4%) than XELIRI, XELIRI was associated with more all grades hand-foot syndrome (34.1% vs 14.8%) and grade 3-4 diarrhea (7.0% vs 3.2%). There was no significant difference in febrile neutropenia (4.2% in FOLFIRI and 2.9% in XELIRI). The addition of bevacizumab did not alter safety profiles between XELIRI and FOLFIRI. There was a treatment-related death in FOLFIRI arm (0.3%). Conclusions: Both FOLFIRI and XELIRI were safe and well tolerated, though there were differences in the rates and toxicity profiles at which adverse events occur. Clinical trial information: NCT01996306. UMIN000012263.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?