Abstract:Abdominal sections of honeybees undergo numerous reciprocating motions during their lifetime. However, the overlapped contact areas adjacent to the abdominal sections have a shallow wear extent, a physical mechanism that remains obscure to date. Therefore, this study explored a biofrictional reduction model based on a solid surface texture and the hairy surface of the honeybee abdomen. We collected honeybee samples and observed their abdomens using a camera (Zeiss Stemi 508). Subsequently, we sliced these samples using a microtome and detected their microscopic friction. The exterior surface of the honeybee abdomen was not smooth but was distributed with a dense microvilli structure, which played a vital role in adjusting the friction reduction characteristics between the abdominal sections. When the adjacent abdominal sections moved relatively to each other, their upper and lower surfaces were not in direct rigid contact. Briefly, this study shows that the microscale hair arrays on the surface of the posterior abdominal segment can significantly reduce real contact area and friction, which considerably decreases wear or abrasion. The friction reduction mechanism alleviates the abrasion during the relative bending movement and saves a large amount of energy, which is essential for the honeybees' daily activities. This microtexture compliance friction reduction characteristic could be used to fabricate hierarchical surfaces for long-lasting friction reduction mechanisms, which increase the life of soft devices, including soft actuators and hinges.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c05500?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c05500</a>.Theoretical derivation of the plastic plane contact model, theoretical derivation of the microtexture compliant contact model, and comparison of friction between the hair model and the nonhair model (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.1c05500/suppl_file/am1c05500_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Honey Bees (apis Mellifera Ligustica) Swing Abdomen to Dissipate Residual Flying Energy Landing on a Wall

Bumblebees Exhibit Adaptive Flapping Responses to Air Disturbances

Movement Analysis of Flexion and Extension of Honeybee Abdomen Based on an Adaptive Segmented Structure

Bumblebees compensate for the adverse effects of sidewind during visually-guided landings

Biomimetic Flip-and-Flap Strategy of Flying Objects for Perching on Inclined Surfaces

Drag Reduction in a Natural High-Frequency Swinging Micro-Articulation: Mouthparts of the Honey Bee.

Bees with attitude: the effect of gusts on flight dynamics

Bumblebees minimize control challenges by combining active and passive modes in unsteady winds

Honeybees Have Hydrophobic Wings That Enable Them to Fly Through Fog and Dew

The kinematics and aerodynamics of hinged wing of honeybees during takeoff

Wax “tails” enable planthopper nymphs to self-right midair and land on their feet

Flies Land Upside Down on a Ceiling Using Rapid Visually Mediated Rotational Maneuvers.

Putting a new spin on insect jumping performance using 3D modeling and computer simulations of spotted lanternfly nymphs

Energy Saving Strategies of Honeybees in Dipping Nectar

Unsteady Aerodynamics and Wing Kinematics Effect in Hovering Insect Flight

Elytra Coupling of the Ladybird Coccinella Septempunctata Functions As an Energy Absorber in Intentional Falls

Avoiding Topsy-Turvy: How Anna'S Hummingbirds (calypte Anna) Fly Through Upward Gusts

Hairy-Layer Friction Reduction Mechanism in the Honeybee Abdomen

Wing and body motion and aerodynamic and leg forces during take-off in droneflies

Elastic storage enables robustness of flapping wing dynamics

Drag Reduction in the Mouthpart of A Honeybee Facilitated by Galea Ridges for Nectar-Dipping Strategy