Phase Ii Clinical Studies of Utd1, an Epothilone Analog, in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Binghe Xu,Pin Zhang,Zhongsheng Tong,Fuguo Tian,Yongsheng Wang,Jun Lan Yang,Lijun Di,Weilian Li,Wei Liu,Rongguo Qiu,Li Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.1040
IF: 45.3
2014-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:1040 Background: UTD1, a genetically engineered epothilone analog, is a microtubule stabilizing agent that showed promising activities in phase I trials. In this report, two open-label, multicenter phase II studies of UTD1 alone or UTD1 plus capecitabine (CAP) were carried out to evaluate its efficacy and safety in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). Methods: In both studies, MBC patient who was pretreated with taxanes, anthracyclines and/or CAP received UTD1 at a dose of 40mg/m2/d intravenously on day 1 to day 5 or at 30mg/m2/d (d1-d5) in combination with CAP (2000mg/m2/d, orally) on d1-d14, every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints were toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) for the combination. Results: 25 pts received a total of 128 cycles in the combination with a median of 6 cycles (range 1-6 cycles) per patient. Among 24 pts who were evaluable for efficacy, responses included one complete response (CR), 11 partial responses (PR), 9 stable diseases (SD), and a median PFS of 7.5 months. In the UTD1 monotherapy, 34 pts received a median of 4 cycles of UTD1 and 30 pts were evaluable for efficacy. One patient had a confirmed CR, 7 had PR and 13 had SD. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was the major adverse event associated with UTD1 toxicity in both studies, but was manageable. 40% of pts in the combination had grade 3 PN or/and foot syndrome compared to 11% in the monotherapy. One patient was removed from the monotherapy after the first cycle because of grade 3 neurotoxicity, which was reversed after 3 weeks. There were no drug-related deaths in the two studies. Other grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (12% vs 3%, combination vs monotherapy), diarrhea (4% vs 3%), myalgia/arthralgia (8% vs 0%), dizziness (4% vs 0 %). Conclusions: UTD1 was well-tolerated in both studies with the primary toxicity being PN, and demonstrated notable antitumor activities in MBC pts. 27% of ORR was seen for the monotherapy or 50% of ORR and a median PFS of 7.5 months for the combination. A multicenter, phase III study of UTD1 plus CAP vs CAP alone in MBC is underway. Clinical trial information: TRC-13004205.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?