4Dct-Based Target Motion and Treatment Planning Variance for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy Account for Breathing Motion
W. Wang,J. Li,H. Hu,T. Fan,M. Xu,Q. Shao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.620
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)To explore the correlation between the respiration-induced target motion and volume variation with the dosimetric variance on breast and OAR during free breathing.Materials/MethodsSeventeen patients after breast conserving surgery underwent respiration-synchronized 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The treatment planning constructed using the end inspiration (EI) scan, then copied and applied to the other respiratory phases and the dose distribution was calculated separately. To evaluate the dose-volume histograms parameters for the PTV, ipsilateral lung and heart.ResultsDuring free breathing, the CTV motion vector was 2.09 ± 0.74 mm, and the volume variation was 3.05 ± 0.94%. There was no correlation between the volume variation of CTV and target/OAR dosimetric variation (|r| = 0.39 ∼ 0.48). In anteroposterior (AP), superoinferior (SI) and vector directions, the CTV movement correlated well with the mean PTV dose, conformal index (CI), and the lung volume receiving high dose (V20, V30, V40, and V50) (|r| = 0.651 ∼ 0.975); in SI and vector directions, the CTV displacement only correlated with the heart volume receiving >5 Gy (V5) (r = -0.795, 0.687). The lung volume variation and the lung volume receiving high dose correlated reasonably well (r = 0.655 ∼ 0.882), and the correlation only exist between the heat volume variation and the V5 of heart (r = -0.701).ConclusionsTarget movement correlated well with the target/OAR dosimetric variation in certain directions, indicating that whole breast IMRT assisted with breathing control or respiratory-adapted gated treatment will promote the accuracy of dose delivery during radiation therapy. To minimize lung irradiation, gated treatment maybe most precise if centered at end expiration. Purpose/Objective(s)To explore the correlation between the respiration-induced target motion and volume variation with the dosimetric variance on breast and OAR during free breathing. To explore the correlation between the respiration-induced target motion and volume variation with the dosimetric variance on breast and OAR during free breathing. Materials/MethodsSeventeen patients after breast conserving surgery underwent respiration-synchronized 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The treatment planning constructed using the end inspiration (EI) scan, then copied and applied to the other respiratory phases and the dose distribution was calculated separately. To evaluate the dose-volume histograms parameters for the PTV, ipsilateral lung and heart. Seventeen patients after breast conserving surgery underwent respiration-synchronized 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The treatment planning constructed using the end inspiration (EI) scan, then copied and applied to the other respiratory phases and the dose distribution was calculated separately. To evaluate the dose-volume histograms parameters for the PTV, ipsilateral lung and heart. ResultsDuring free breathing, the CTV motion vector was 2.09 ± 0.74 mm, and the volume variation was 3.05 ± 0.94%. There was no correlation between the volume variation of CTV and target/OAR dosimetric variation (|r| = 0.39 ∼ 0.48). In anteroposterior (AP), superoinferior (SI) and vector directions, the CTV movement correlated well with the mean PTV dose, conformal index (CI), and the lung volume receiving high dose (V20, V30, V40, and V50) (|r| = 0.651 ∼ 0.975); in SI and vector directions, the CTV displacement only correlated with the heart volume receiving >5 Gy (V5) (r = -0.795, 0.687). The lung volume variation and the lung volume receiving high dose correlated reasonably well (r = 0.655 ∼ 0.882), and the correlation only exist between the heat volume variation and the V5 of heart (r = -0.701). During free breathing, the CTV motion vector was 2.09 ± 0.74 mm, and the volume variation was 3.05 ± 0.94%. There was no correlation between the volume variation of CTV and target/OAR dosimetric variation (|r| = 0.39 ∼ 0.48). In anteroposterior (AP), superoinferior (SI) and vector directions, the CTV movement correlated well with the mean PTV dose, conformal index (CI), and the lung volume receiving high dose (V20, V30, V40, and V50) (|r| = 0.651 ∼ 0.975); in SI and vector directions, the CTV displacement only correlated with the heart volume receiving >5 Gy (V5) (r = -0.795, 0.687). The lung volume variation and the lung volume receiving high dose correlated reasonably well (r = 0.655 ∼ 0.882), and the correlation only exist between the heat volume variation and the V5 of heart (r = -0.701). ConclusionsTarget movement correlated well with the target/OAR dosimetric variation in certain directions, indicating that whole breast IMRT assisted with breathing control or respiratory-adapted gated treatment will promote the accuracy of dose delivery during radiation therapy. To minimize lung irradiation, gated treatment maybe most precise if centered at end expiration. Target movement correlated well with the target/OAR dosimetric variation in certain directions, indicating that whole breast IMRT assisted with breathing control or respiratory-adapted gated treatment will promote the accuracy of dose delivery during radiation therapy. To minimize lung irradiation, gated treatment maybe most precise if centered at end expiration.