Comparision of Predictive Value Between RECIST and Maximum Three Dimensional Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Lung Cancer.

Wenzhao Zhong,Qing-yi Hou,Qi-bin Chen,Xue-ning Yang,Ning Zhao,Hong-Hong Yan,Jinji Yang,Qing Zhou,Yi-Long Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e19107
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e19107 Background: Tumor burden is one of the most important prognostic factors for lung cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive significance of metabolic tumor burden (MTB) measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with the traditional RECIST criteria in patients with lung cancer. Methods: Included in the study were 78 consecutive lung cancer patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT examination before and after systemic treatment. Metabolic tumor burden in terms of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the maximum diameter (D), three size product (M) and 2 maximum diameter product (S) were determined, and compared for their performance in response rate (RR), and predicting overall survival (OS). Nonlinear model( ln(v/v0) = k1t+u1) assuming index X change with time in proportion was utilized. Results: The estimated Eviews output was ln(v/v0) = -0.005268t+e1 . The role of MTV change with time was V = v0 e-0.005268t ( 0.5268% decrease per day, p = 0.0000), compared with S = s3-0e-0.0023t ( 0.23% decrease per day, p = 0.0060) in the 2 maximum diameter of the product, and M = m0e-0.003935t ( 0.3953% decrease per day, p = 0.002) in three size product. The degree of model fitting for survival of D, M and MTV is R2 = 0.30537, R2 = 0.316024, and R2 = 0.396004, respectively. Conclusions: The ratio of change between MTV and time (v) is more significant compared with 2 maximum diameter product (S) and three size product(M) . MTV is the most sensitive predictor for RR and OS, and might serve as a surrogate marker for prediction of outcome in patients with lung cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?