Abstract:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT has not been determined. Therefore, we conducted 2 phase II studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5 fluorouracil (5-Fu) (TPF) followed by radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with stage III and IV(A - B) NPC. This article is the preliminary report on treatment related toxicities and response. METHODS Graded according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging criteria, only patients with stage III or IV(A-B) poorly differentiated or undifferentiated NPC (World Health Organization type II/III) were included. We planned to recruit 52 patients with stage III disease and 64 patients with stage IV(A - B) disease. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TPF (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1; cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), day 1; 5 Fu 500 mg/(m2 x day), continuous intravenous infusion for 120 h), every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) concurrent with radiotherapy. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were used. Gross disease planning target volume (PTV), high risk and low risk subclinical PTV doses were prescribed at 70-76 Gy, 66-70 Gy, and 60-61.25 Gy at 1.75-2.0 Gy per fraction. The lower neck or supraclavicular fields may be treated with conventional AP/PA fields for a total of 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. Patients were evaluated for tumor response after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and at 3 months after radiation according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). The latest version of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE 3.0) was used for grading all adverse events. RESULTS Fifty nine patients were evaluable for treatment response. Thirty patients had stage III disease and 29 patients had stage IV(A-B). All patients completed RT to the prescribed dose and 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 51 patients (86.4%) completing 3 cycles. A total of 50 (84.7%) and 39 patients (66.1%) completed 4 weeks and 5 weeks of cisplatin during CCRT, respectively. The overall response rate in the primary site and the neck region were 94.9% [complete response (CR) in 25.4%] and 100% (CR in 19.6%) after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At 3 months after RT, the CR rates increased to 96.6% and 90.2%, respectively. After a median follow up of 14.3 months, we observed 5 treatment failures and 2 deaths. The 1 year overall survival, distant metastasis free survival, and locoregional relapse free survival rates were 100%, 95.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. The rates of grade 3/4 myelosuppression and anorexia/nausea/vomiting during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 55.9% and 16.9%, respectively. The corresponding rates were 11.9% and 23.7% during CCRT. Grade 3/4 mucositis, skin desquamation, and xerostomia occurred in 6.8%, 44.1%, and 27.1% of patients, respectively. There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TPF followed by CCRT was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Preliminary results are encouraging and warrant further investigation.

Preliminary Outcome of the Survival Rate and Possible Prognostic Factors for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Premilinary Survival Results and Potential Beneficiaries for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy And Prognostic Subgroups Defined By Survival Benefit In Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Preliminary Results of a Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Chemotherapy Neoadjuvantly or Concurrently with Radiotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase III Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.

Can Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improve Survival in Stage T3-4N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma? A Propensity Matched Analysis.

Comparison of long-term efficacy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal

Comparison of long-term efficacy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Treatment Outcomes of a Prospective, Multicentric Clinical Study

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Ascending or Descending Types of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Retrospective Analysis of Induction Chemotherapy plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy under Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Mode for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Interim Results from 2 Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trials

Long-term results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for T3/T4 locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Low-Dose Fractionated Radiotherapy Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for T3-4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: the Preliminary Results of a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sequential Chemotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Management of Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Experience of 370 Consecutive Cases

Individualized Concurrent Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage III–IVa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Definitive Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

IMRT Combined with Concurrent Chemotherapy Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Combined with Concurrent Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant and Concurrent Chemotherapy Have Varied Impacts on the Prognosis of Patients with the Ascending and Descending Types of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Decreased Overall and Cancer-Specific Mortality with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated by Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy: Multivariate Competing Risk Analysis.