Steady regime of radiation pressure acceleration with foil thickness adjustable within micrometers under a 10–100 PW laser
Meng Liu,Wei-Min Wang,Yu-Tong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.109.015208
IF: 2.707
2024-01-27
Physical Review E
Abstract:Quasimonoenergetic GeV-scale protons are predicted to be efficiently generated via radiation pressure acceleration (RPA) when the foil thickness is matched with the laser intensity, e.g., Lmat of several nm to 100 nm for 1019−1022Wcm−2 available in laboratory. However, nonmonoenergetic protons with much lower energies than predicted were usually observed in RPA experiments because of too small foil thickness which cannot support insufficient laser contrast and foil surface roughness. Besides the technical problems, we here find that there is an upper-limit thickness Lup derived from the requirement that the laser energy should dominate over the ion source energy in the effective laser-proton interaction zone, and Lup is lower than Lmat with the intensity below 1022Wcm−2 , which causes inefficient or unsteady RPA. As the intensity is enhanced to ≥1023Wcm−2 provided by 10–100 PW laser facilities, Lup can significantly exceed Lmat , and therefore RPA becomes efficient. In this regime, Lmat acts as a lower-limit thickness for efficient RPA, so the matching thickness can be extended to a continuous range from Lmat to Lup ; the range can reach micrometers, within which foil thickness is adjustable. This makes RPA steady and meanwhile the above technical problems can be overcome. Particle-in-cell simulation shows that multi-GeV quasimonoenergetic proton beams can be steadily generated and the fluctuation of the energy peaks and the energy conversation efficiency remains stable although the thickness is taken in a larger range with increasing intensity. This work predicts that near future RPA experiments with 10–100 PW facilities will enter a new regime with a large range of usable foil thicknesses that can be adjusted to the interaction conditions for steady acceleration. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.015208 ©2024 American Physical Society
physics, fluids & plasmas, mathematical