Abstract:Increasing computational power and improving deep learning methods have made computer vision technologies pervasively common in urban environments. Their applications in policing, traffic management, and documenting public spaces are increasingly common (Ridgeway 2018, Coifman et al. 1998, Sun et al. 2020). Despite the often-discussed biases in the algorithms' training and unequally borne benefits (Khosla et al. 2012), almost all applications similarly reduce urban experiences to simplistic, reductive, and mechanistic measures. There is a lack of context, depth, and specificity in these practices that enables semantic knowledge or analysis within urban contexts, especially within the context of using and occupying urban space. This paper will critique existing uses of artificial intelligence and computer vision in urban practices to propose a new framework for understanding people, action, and public space. This paper revisits Geertz's (1973) use of thick descriptions in generating interpretive theories of culture and activity and uses this lens to establish a framework to approach evaluating the varied uses of computer vision technologies that weigh meaning. By discussing cases of implemented examples of urban computer vision—from LinkNYC and Numina's urban measurements to the Detroit Police's use of DataWorks Plus's facial recognition technology—it proposes a framework for evaluating the thickness of the algorithm's conclusions against the computational method's complexity required to produce that outcome. Further, we discuss how the framework's positioning may differ (and conflict) between different users of the technology, from engineer to urban planner and policymaker, to citizen. This paper also discusses how the current use and training of deep learning algorithms and how this process limits semantic learning and proposes three potential methodologies toward gaining a more contextually specific, urban-semantic, description of urban space relevant to urbanists. This paper contributes to the critical conversations regarding the proliferation of artificial intelligence by challenging the current applications of these technologies in the urban environment by highlighting their failures within this context while also proposing an evolution of these algorithms that may ultimately make them sensitive and useful within this spatial and cultural milieu.

Urban Computing: a challenging problem for Semantic Technologies,

Semantic Framework Of Internet Of Things For Smart Cities: Case Studies

Intelligent Urban Traffic Management via Semantic Interoperability across Multiple Heterogeneous Mobility Data Sources

Semantic web technologies in pervasive computing

Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges

Elm Meets Urban Big Data Analysis: Case Studies

Cities of the Future: Employing Wireless Sensor Networks for Efficient Decision Making in Complex Environments

Elm Meets Urban Computing: Ensemble Urban Data For Smart City Application

Computação Urbana da Teoria à Prática: Fundamentos, Aplicações e Desafios

Special Issue on Intelligent Urban Computing with Big Data.

Urban-semantic computer vision: a framework for contextual understanding of people in urban spaces

Understanding Sensor Cities: Insights from Technology Giant Company Driven Smart Urbanism Practices

An Architecture for Integrated Intelligence in Urban Management using Cloud Computing

AI and Deep Learning for Urban Computing

Urban Emergency Management using Intelligent Traffic Systems: Challenges and Future Directions

IEEE Access Special Section Editorial: Urban Computing and Well-Being in Smart Cities: Services, Applications, Policymaking Considerations

From Data Harvesting to Querying for Making Urban Territories Smart

Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: urban computing and intelligence for strategic, short-term, and joined-up planning

Ontology Bulding vs Data Harvesting and Cleaning for Smart-city Services

An Urban Intelligence Architecture for Heterogeneous Data and Application Integration, Deployment and Orchestration