Abstract:In this issue of the Journal, Di Costanzo et al. ( 1 ) report the result of a randomized phase III trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Cancer Research. They conclude that despite very promising previ- ous results in the setting of advanced gastric cancer ( 2 ), there are no positive effects of cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) as adjuvant chemotherapy on overall and disease-free survival of gastric cancer patients who have undergone complete surgical resection. In the trial, 258 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy or surgery alone over a 5-year period. Fifty-five percent of the patients underwent D2 or more extended nodal dis- section, and the median number of lymph nodes harvested per patient was greater than 15. The study not only demonstrates that PELF as an adjuvant regimen cannot improve patient survival but also suggests that data obtained in the setting of advanced gastric cancer may not be applicable to the adjuvant setting. Here we do not think it meaningful to criticize the shortcom- ings of this study (including, as always, the low rate of D2 nodal dissection that is common to Western studies), but it would be helpful to rethink the strategies on which this and similar studies are based. The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer has been debated for a long time. Randomized controlled clinical trials that investigated the effi cacy and toxicity of different adjuvant regimens among different gastric cancer patient groups have yielded inconsistent results ( 3 - 7 ), and meta-analyses of data regarding the benefi t of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer have found hazards reduction of death to be 0.12 - 0.20 ( 8 - 11 ). We are still not able to draw a defi nite conclusion as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy confers advantages to gastric cancer patients who have undergone curative resection. It is appropriate to ask how these negative results can help patients ( 12 ) and how we as professionals in the fi eld of gastric cancer management can resolve the dilemma as to whether adju- vant chemotherapy should be used in gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection. More and more studies on adjuvant chemotherapy of gastric cancer are forthcoming, and the dilemma persists. The negative overall result may refl ect a positive effect in one subgroup and a negative effect in another. Therefore, one strategy is to identify the subgroup(s) that actually benefi t from adjuvant chemotherapy. Di Costanzo et al. ( 1 ) analyzed the interaction between covariates and adjuvant treatment and showed that the benefi t of treatment, if any, was confi ned to older patients over 60 years old. In this article, the authors also reported some suggestive results from a parallel study that sought to determine the prognos- tic value of additional biomolecular factors (P53, c-erbB2, MIB-1, TS, and Herg1), and the strategy of using biologic markers to identify subgroups of patients that would benefi t from therapy has been pursued in other kinds of human cancers. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project investigated the value of high-degree microsatellite instability (MSI-H) as a marker to predict benefi t from adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer and found that there was a strong inverse relationship between MSI-H and mutant p53 status ( P < .001), although the data did not support the use of MSI-H as a predictive marker of chemotherapy benefi t. Hazard ratios (HRs) for relapse-free survival for MSI-H vs microsatellite-stable and low-degree MSI patients were 0.77 (95% confi dence interval (CI) = 0.40 to 1.48) in the untreated patient group and 0.60 (95% CI = 0.30 to 1.19) in the treated group ( 13 ). With molecular classifi cation, gastric cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence may eventually be identifi ed, just as breast can- cer patients with a high risk of recurrence are now identifi ed based on HER-2/neu overexpression as candidates for specifi c adjuvant therapy regimens, as recommended by the National Comprehen- sive Cancer Network. It has been hypothesized that some cytoxic regimens or thera- peutic models are not effective in the adjuvant setting. However, recently, Sakuramoto et al. ( 7 ) reported the very promising result of S-1, an oral fl uoropyrimidine, as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and extended (D2) lymph node dissection. A total of 1059 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with S-1 or surgery alone. The 3-year overall survival rate was 80.1% in the S-1 group and 70.1% among those treated with surgery alone. The hazard ratio for death in the S-1 group compared with the surgery- only group was 0.68 (95% CI = 0.52 to 0.87, P = .003). Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were not common ( 7 ). However, before we translate this promising result into clinical practice in Western countries, further clinical trials will be needed to confi rm its effi cacy in this new setting. Furthermore, subdivision of stage II and III gastric cancer patients to identify those most likely to benefi t from S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is also needed, as sug- gested above. A US intergroup study has provided evidence as to the potential value of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation in that treatment consisting of 5-fl uorouracil plus leucovorin combined with radiotherapy led to an improvement in overall survival relative to surgery alone ( 14 ). The median overall survival in the surgery-only

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Less Drug, Same Efficacy

[Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: More Drugs Do Not Mean Better Efficacy].

Retrospective Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Curatively Resected Gastric Cancer

Retrospective analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Surgery Alone For Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinomas or Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas.

Triplet versus doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Adjuvant Chemotherapy is an Additional Option for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer after Radical Gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy: A Retrospective Control Study

Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer or not: a dilemma?

A Retrospective Study of Adjuvant Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Plus S-1 after D2 Gastrectomy Versus Oxaliplatin Plus S-1 in Gastric Cancer

Impact of duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in radically resected patients with T4bN1-3M0/TxN3bM0 gastric cancer.

A randomized, controlled, multi-center, open-label study of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) for stage III gastric cancer after D2 resection.

Adjuvant Therapy for Early Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Downstaging Effect Rather Than the Full Intended Cycles of Perioperative Chemotherapy Determines the Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Experience of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Comparative Study of the Clinical Efect between Docetaxel-based hree and Two Drugs Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients ater Radical Gastrectomy

Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for Gastric Cancer: Implications for Target Definition

Postoperative Radiation Combined with Triple Regimen Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction

Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in HER2(–) locally advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Epirubicin-Based Triplet Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction.