Efficacy and Tolerability of Bevacizumab (BEV) Plus Capecitabine and Cisplatin (XP) in Chinese Patients (pts) with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric/gastroesophageal Junction Cancer (AGC): Results from the AVATAR Study.

Lin Shen,Jin Li,Jian-Ming Xu,Hong-Ming Pan,Guanghai Dai,Shukui Qin,Liwei Wang,Jinwan Wang,Zhenzhou Yang,Shu Yongqian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.73
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:73 Background: In the AVAGAST study, chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin) + BEV did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) vs. chemotherapy + placebo. Geographic differences in efficacy were observed, but only 12 Chinese pts were included. AVATAR, a study similar in design to AVAGAST, is a randomized double-blind study conducted exclusively in China in pts with AGC. Methods: Pts aged >18 years with gastric adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1 to XP + BEV 7.5 mg/kg or placebo + XP. The primary objective was OS; secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 202 pts were well balanced. The primary efficacy endpoint of improved OS in the BEV arm was not met (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79–1.56; p=0.5567; see table ). BEV + XP was well tolerated. Grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were 60% and 19% for BEV and 68% vs. 21% for placebo, respectively. Grade 3–5 AEs of special interest with BEV occurred in 8% of BEV pts and 15% of placebo pts; the difference was mainly due to grade 3–5 haemorrhage (BEV 4%, placebo 12%). Conclusions: Addition of BEV to XP in Chinese pts with AGC did not significantly improve outcomes in AVATAR. The results from AVATAR are consistent with the findings seen in the Asian sub-population of the previous AVAGAST study. [Table: see text]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?