Role of Rho-Associated Coiled-Coil Forming Kinase Isoforms in Regulation of Stiffness-Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation in Lung Fibrosis.

Su S. Htwe,Byung H. Cha,Kan Yue,Ali Khademhosseini,Alan J. Knox,Amir M. Ghaemmaghami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2016-0306oc
IF: 7.748
2017-01-01
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Abstract:Fibrosis is a major cause of progressive organ dysfunction in several chronic pulmonary diseases. Rho-associated coiled-coil forming kinase (ROCK) has been shown to be involved in myofibroblast differentiation driven by alteredmatrix stiffness in a fibrotic state. There are two known ROCK isoforms in humans, ROCK1 and ROCK2, but the specific roleof each isoform in myofibroblast differentiation in lung fibrosis remains unknown. To study this, we developed a gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel-based culture system with different stiffness levels relevant to healthy and fibrotic lungs. We have shown that stiff matrix, but not soft matrix, can induce myofibroblast differentiation with high smooth muscle actin isoform (alpha SMA) expression. Furthermore, our data confirmed that the inhibition of ROCK signaling by a pharmacological inhibitor (i.e., Y27632) attenuates stiffness-induced alpha SMA expression and fiber assembly in myofibroblasts. To assess the role of ROCK isoforms in this process, we used short interfering RNA to knock down the expression of each isoform. Our data showed that knocking down either ROCK1 or ROCK2 did not result in a reduction in alpha SMA expression in myofibroblasts on stiff matrix, as opposed to soft matrix, where alpha SMA expressionwas reduced significantly. Paradoxically, on stiff matrix, the absence of one isoform (particularly ROCK2) exaggerated alpha SMA expression and led to thick fiber assembly. Moreover, complete loss of alpha SMA fiber assembly was seen only in the absence of both ROCK isoforms, suggesting that both isoforms are implicated in this process. Overall, our results indicate the differential role of ROCK isoforms in myofibroblast differentiation on soft and stiff matrices.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?