Comparison of Two Antibiotic Prophylaxis Schemes for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Postmenopausal Women

ZHONG Yi-hong,FANG Yi,FU Chen-sheng,YUAN Min,JI Jun,TENG Jie,ZOU Jian-zhou,DING Xiao-qiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-7097.2008.12.002
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of intermittent patient-initiated single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) in postmenopausal women. Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection. Single dose of antibiotic was given every night in continuous antibiotic prophylaxis group and every time after exposure to conditions predisposed to UTI in intermittent antibiotic prophylaxis group. The duration of prevention was 12 months in both groups. Results The effective rates of intermittent antibiotic prophylaxis and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis were 71.0% and 81.8% respectively (P>0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reaction in intermittent antibiotic prophylaxis group was significantly lower than that in continuous antibiotic prophylaxis group (7.7% vs 28.6%,P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with continuous antibiotic prophylaxis, intermittent patient-initiated single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is a better prophylaxis with less gastrointestinal adverse reactions for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?