Clinical Features and Prognosis Analysis of Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study over A Decade of Patients in China

Wen-Yan Yu,Mei Geng,Jie Hao,Mei Chen,Su-Jiang Zhang,Jin Wang,Jian-Qing Mi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2017.02.005
2017-01-01
Abstract:One hundred and fifty patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma at 4 medical centers over a decade were reviewed. General clinical features were comparable to western patients, while therapeutic outcomes were slightly inferior. A new risk model incorporating traditional risk factors and interim imaging response stratified patients into three classes with distinct outcomes, which warrants further validations for better risk-adapted therapeutic strategy.Objective: There is little information available regarding Chinese patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We analyzed the clinical features, outcome, and prognostic factors of Chinese patients with HL, aiming to establish a new risk model for better risk-adapted therapeutic strategy. Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed HL at 4 medical centers from January 2000 to August 2014 were recruited. Results: A total of 150 patients were reviewed. The median age was 30 years ( range, 15-91 years). At completion of initial therapy, 73.65% of patients achieved complete remission. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of the entire cohort was 61.1%, the overall survival was 84.7%, and the disease-free survival was 78.8%. B symptoms, extranodal involvement, and International Prognostic Score >= 3 remained as independent prognostic factors of EFS. Patients who failed to reach complete remission on interim positron emission tomography/computed tomography or computed tomography had a significantly worse outcome than those who did. A new risk model incorporating traditional risk factors and interim response stratified patients into 3 classes, with a 5-year EFS of 100%, 83.1%, and 33.1%, respectively ( P < .0001). Conclusions: General clinical features were comparable with those of Western patients, whereas therapeutic outcomes were slightly inferior. The novel risk assessment model showed potential as a more powerful prognostic tool by identifying 3 subsets of patients with significantly distinct outcomes, which warrants further validations.(C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?