Distinct Levels Of Radioresistance In Lgr5(+) Colonic Epithelial Stem Cells Versus Lgr5(+) Small Intestinal Stem Cells

Guoqiang Hua,Chu Wang,Yan Pan,Zhaoshi Zeng,Sang Gyu Lee,Maria Laura Martin,Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman,Zvi Fuks,Philip B. Paty,Richard Kolesnick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2870
IF: 11.2
2017-01-01
Cancer Research
Abstract:Although small and large intestines possess seemingly similar Wnt-driven leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5)(+) adult epithelial stem cells, we report here that the two organs exhibit distinct mechanisms of tissue response to ionizing radiation. Employing Lgr5-lacZ transgenic mice and Lgr5 in situ hybridization, we found colonic epithelial stem cells (CESC) markedly more radioresistant in vivo than small intestinal crypt base columnar stem cells (CBC; D-0 = 6.0 +/- 0.3 Gy vs. 1.3 +/- 0.1, respectively; P < 0.01). Accordingly, CESCs survived 30 Gy exposure, while CBCs were completely depleted after 15 Gy. EdU incorporation studies indicated that after 19 Gy, CBCs exited growth arrest at 12 hours, resuming normal mitotic activity despite 60% of this population displaying residual gH2AX foci, indicative of persistent unrepaired DNA damage. Checkpoint recovery before complete double-strand break (DSB) repair represents the sine qua non of a newly defined potentially lethal pathophysiology termed checkpoint adaptation. In the small intestinal mucosa, checkpoint adaptation resulted in CBCs succumbing to an 8-fold increase in the incidence of highly lethal chromosomal aberrations and mitotic catastrophe by 48 hours postradiation. In contrast, Lgr5(+) CESCs displayed delayed checkpoint recovery at 48 hours post-19 Gy, coordinated with complete DSB repair and regeneration of colonic mucosa originating, at least in part, from surviving CESCs. The discovery that small intestinal CBCs succumb to checkpoint adaptation is the first demonstration that this aberrant cell-cycle response may drive mammalian tissue radio-sensitivity. (C) 2017 AACR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?