Associations between LEP and LEPR and risk for breast cancer

Charles E. Matthews,Qiuyin Cai,Jirong Long,Chun Li,Lan Jiang,Yu-Tang Gao,Wei Zheng
2007-01-01
Abstract:B97 Leptin and its receptor are over-expressed in breast tumors, and polymorphisms in the genes encoding leptin ( LEP ) and its receptor ( LEPR ) have been associated with survival following a breast cancer diagnosis. However, we are aware of only two small studies ( LEP and LEPR and risk or incident breast cancer, and these studies provide some evidence of association. Accordingly, our objective was to describe associations between incident breast cancer and sequence variations in these genes, as well as gene-environment interactions between these genes and adiposity and physical activity levels in a moderately large case-control study of Asian women.
 >The Shanghai Breast Cancer Study (SBCS) is a population-based case control study of incident breast cancer. Cases (n=1,455) were identified through the Shanghai Cancer Registry, and controls (n=1,556) were recruited from the local community. Participation rate for cases was 91%, and for controls it was 90%. Interviewers obtained detailed information on demographic and breast cancer risk factors, and measured participant’s height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences. Exercise participation in the last 10 yrs was assessed by self-report. Genotyping was completed for 1,079 cases and 1,082 controls using the Affymetrix MegAllele Targeted Genotyping System. Haplotype tagging SNPs were identified from the Chinese samples (CHB) included in the HapMap Project by searching each gene and its flanking regions (±5 kb) using Tagger (pair-wise; r 2 ≥ 0.9; MAF ≥ 0.05). Nonsynonymous and promoter region SNPs (MAF ≥ 0.05) were also included. Ten and 35 markers were evaluated for LEP and LEPR , respectively. Gene main effects were investigated using single-marker methods that tested associations overall, by allele, and for trend. Also, gene-environment interactions were evaluated by fitting each marker (0, 1, 2), the environmental factor, and their cross-product interaction term in logistic models.
 >Participants were on average 47 yrs of age; had BMIs of 23.4 kg/m 2 ; 22% reported regular exercise participation; and 34% were postmenopausal. Single marker analyses revealed no association between any of the LEP markers and breast cancer risk (all p ≥ 0.17). In contrast, 6 of 35 LEPR markers were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (11 of 105 [10.5%] statistical tests). In terms of the environmental factors alone, exercise participation (0,1) was inversely associated (OR=0.64 [0.51-0.80]), and BMI on a continuous scale was positively associated with risk (OR=1.029 [1.00-1.05]). We found no evidence of interaction between LEP and either of the environmental exposures, but two LEPR markers were observed to interact with BMI (both p Our results suggest an initial association between LEPR and breast cancer in Asian women, and a possible interaction between LEPR and BMI. We are currently conducting multimarker (haplotype) analyses of these data, and are working to replicate the significant findings noted here in an independent sample from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study (N~1,800).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?