EAST-LC: Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial of S-1 Versus Docetaxel (DOC) in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Had Received a Platinum-Based Treatment: Results from Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros)

R. Soo,T. S. K. Mok,Y-K. Shi,L. Zhang,S. Lu,J. C-H. Yang,K. Nakagawa,N. Yamamoto,H. Nokihara,S. Sugawara,M. Nishio,T. Takahashi,K. Goto,J. Chang,M. Maemondo,Y. Ichinose,Y. Cheng,W. Lim,S. Morita,T. Tamura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw383.18
IF: 51.769
2017-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Two phase II studies had evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1, an oral 5-FU, in patients with previously treated NSCLC. The results of these studies suggested that S-1 was comparable to the docetaxel (DOC), a standard therapy for previously treated NSCLC. This randomized phase III study aims to establish non-inferiority of S-1 monotherapy to DOC in patients with previously treated NSCLC in Asia. Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received at least 1 regimen of platinum-based chemotherapy with/without prior exposure to gefitinib or erlotinib were eligible. Patients were randomized to S-1 (80-120 mg/day on days 1-28 every 42-day) or DOC (60 mg/m2 in Japan, 75 mg/m2 in other countries, on day 1 every 21days). The primary objective was to evaluate whether S-1 is non-inferior to DOC in terms of overall survival (OS) (upper CI limit for HR < 1.2). Secondary objectives include progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR), quality of life, and safety. Total of 1154 patients were enrolled from 7/2010 to 6/2014; and median follow-up time was 30.75 months. The median OS of the S-1 group was non-inferior to the DOC group (12.75 months versus 12.52 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.945; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.833-1.073; P =0.3818). Subgroup analysis by country (Japan vs non-Japan) is summarized in Table. PFS was also similar between the two groups (2.86 months versus 2.89 months). Grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and neutropenia were higher in the DOC group (0.9%vs 13.6%; 5.4% vs 47.7% in S1 and DOC group, respective). Other non-hematoloic toxicities in S1 and DOC group are as followed; diarrhea (37.2% versus 18.2%), stomatitis (23.9% versus 14.5%) and decreased appetite (52.6% versus 37.9%), respectively.Tabled 1JapanNon-JapanDOCS-1DOCS-1No of Pt359361211216MST(m)12.613.412.110.8HR (95%CI)0.922(0.789-1.079)1.056(0.854-1.307)Interaction test P value0.3374 Open table in a new tab S-1 is non-inferior to DOC in terms of OS, with tolerable toxicity. S-1 monotherapy is one of the treatment options for patients with previously treated NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?