Sourcing Strategies under Tariff Uncertainty
Lezhen Wu,Xiaole Wu,Shuyue Yi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4280589
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Due to the U.S.-China trade war, multinational firms (MNFs) may develop new contract manufacturers (CMs) outside China to evade the high tariff on Chinese exports to the U.S. market. We investigate a sourcing game where competing MNFs decide whether to develop new CMs in a new region to overcome the uncertainty of future tariffs. First, we find that MNFs prefer to develop new CMs when tariffs are expected to rise moderately rather than sharply. This is because a newly developed CM will compete more fiercely with an MNF's existing CM for intermediate tariffs. Higher tariff uncertainty can either increase or decrease the expected value of developing a new CM (referred to as option value). For a reasonably high range of tariffs, increasing uncertainty makes the diversified development strategy more likely to be the equilibrium. When there is an upward tariff shock that induces the equilibrium where both MNFs develop a CM, we find that both MNFs must be worse off; only when an upward tariff shock induces the asymmetric development equilibrium is it possible that the MNF developing a CM can be better off, even considering the tariff increase and development cost. Second, the impact of supplier development cost on MNFs' incentives to develop new CMs is non-monotone. That is, as the development cost increases within a certain range, the equilibrium can switch from both not developing new CMs to the case with one developing a new CM. This is driven by the fact that for a certain range of low development costs, each MNF refrains from developing a new CM which will trigger the undesirable outcome that both MNFs develop new CMs. Third, when the future tariff is expected to be high, an increase in competition intensity drives MNFs to diversify their development strategies. For intermediate expected future tariff, the value of developing a new CM decreases in competition intensity. Furthermore, increasing competition is not necessarily harmful for MNFs. We also extend the analysis to consider asymmetric development costs and unobservable wholesale prices for robustness check.