A New Hybrid Method for Differential Diagnosis of Parkinsonism.

Ping Wu,Sasa Cheng,Jianjun Wu,Stefan Farster,Kuangyu Shi,Chuantao Zuo
2016-01-01
Abstract:1836 Objectives Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) often presents with symptoms similar to atypical parkinsonism, such as multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Spatial covariance analysis (SCA) on metabolic imaging has been used to identify characteristic network patterns of PD, MSA and PSP, which demonstrated a great potential for the differentiation of parkinsonism. In this study, we proposed a new hybrid method to further improve the differentiation of PD, MSA and PSP. Methods The hybrid method combines SCA and metabolic activity of disease-sensitive anatomic regions for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. The metabolic activity was normalized by paracentral lobule (determined after comparison with normalization by cerebellum and global mean). A multinomial classifier on combined features using error-correcting output codes was established by performing resting-state brain FDG PET imaging in 53 patients with clinical diagnosis (33PD, 10MSA and 10PSP). The classifier for differential diagnosis was then validated in other 356 patients. After the imaging, these patients were assessed by blinded movement disorders specialists for a mean of 2.1 years before a final clinical diagnosis was made. The accuracy of the image-based classification was assessed by comparison with the final clinical diagnosis. Results 251 patients had a final clinical diagnosis of PD, 75 MSA, and 30 PSP. The proposed hybrid method of classification for PD had 95% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 97% positive predictive value (PPV) and 89% negative predictive value (NPV). Imaging classifications were also accurate for MSA (88% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 88% PPV and 97% NPV) and PSP (83% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 74% PPV and 98% NPV). Conclusions The new hybrid method based on FDG PET imaging performed at the time of initial referral for parkinsonism accurately predicted the clinical diagnosis of individual patients made at subsequent follow-up. The high specificity in distinguishing between parkinsonian disorders could help in selecting treatment for early-stage patients and identifying participants for clinical trials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?