Evaluating Core Technology Capacity Based on an Improved Catastrophe Progression Method: the Case of Automotive Industry

Shijia Zhao,Zongwei Liu,Yue Wang,Fuquan Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2265236
2017-01-01
Abstract:Subjectivity usually causes large fluctuations in evaluation results. Many scholars attempt to establish new mathematical methods to make evaluation results consistent with actual objective situations. An improved catastrophe progression method (ICPM) is constructed to overcome the defects of the original method. The improved method combines the merits of the principal component analysis' information coherence and the catastrophe progression method's none index weight and has the advantage of highly objective comprehensive evaluation. Through the systematic analysis of the influencing factors of the automotive industry's core technology capacity, the comprehensive evaluation model is established according to the different roles that different indices play in evaluating the overall goal with a hierarchical structure. Moreover, ICPM is developed for evaluating the automotive industry's core technology capacity for the typical seven countries in the world, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?