Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab Salvage Chemoimmunotherapy In Relapsed Or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The Orcharrd Study (Omb110928)

Gustaaf W. van Imhoff,Andrew McMillan,Matthew J. Matasar,John Radford,Kirit M. Ardeshna,Won-Seog Kim,Xiaonan Hong,Jette Soenderskov Goerloev,Andrew Davies,María Dolores Caballero Barrigón,Michinori Ogura,Michael Fennessy,Qiming Liao,Bronno van der Holt,Steen Lisby,Thomas S. Lin,Anton Hagenbeek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V124.21.630.630
IF: 20.3
2014-01-01
Blood
Abstract:Background: Salvage chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for responding patients, is standard treatment for fit patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) failing first line rituximab-CHOP treatment. Response to salvage treatment is critical for a durable progression free survival (PFS) following ASCT. The 3-year event free survival (EFS) for patients treated with rituximab (R) in first-line regimens who received salvage chemotherapy in combination with R was only 21% (ref-1). The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab (O) has shown efficacy in R resistant lymphoma cell lines and in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate grade lymphoma when combined with chemotherapy (ref-2). In this randomised phase III study we compared the efficacy of O versus R in combination with DHAP (cisplatin, cytarabine, dexamethasone), aiming to improve PFS following salvage treatment and ASCT (NCT01014208).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?