Abstract:The ability of general scaling models to capture the central tendency or dispersion in biological data has been questioned. In fact, the appropriate domain of such models has never been clearly articulated and they have been supported and challenged using both interspecific and/or intraspecific data. Here, we evaluate several simplifying assumptions and predictions of two prominent scaling models: West, Brown and Enquist's fractal model (WBE) and a null model of geometric similarity (GEOM). Using data for 53 herbaceous angiosperm species from the Songnen Grasslands of Northern China, we compared both the interspecific and intraspecific scaling relationships for plant geometry and biomass partitioning. Specifically, we considered biomass investment in shoots and leaves as well as related several traits not commonly collected in plant allometric analyses: shoot volume, leaf number, and mean leaf mass. At the interspecific level, we find substantial variation in regression slopes, and the simplifying assumptions of WBE and predictions of both the WBE and GEOM models do not hold. In contrast, we find substantial support for the WBE model at the intraspecific level, and to a lesser extent for GEOM. The differences between our results at interspecific and intraspecific levels are due to the fact that leaf size and stem tissue density vary considerably across species in contrast to the simplifying assumptions of WBE. These results highlight the domain within which simplifying model assumptions might be most appropriate, and suggest allometric models may be useful points of departure within some species, growth forms or taxonomic groups.

Isometrical Scaling Between Leaf Volume and Mass.

Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships

Scaling Relationship Between Tree Respiration Rates and Biomass

Scaling Relationships Between Leaf Mass and Total Plant Mass Across Chinese Forests

Isometric Scaling Relationship Between Leaf Number and Size Within Current-Year Shoots of Woody Species Across Contrasting Habitats

Is Mass-Based Metabolism Rate Proportional to Surface Area in Plant Leaves? A Data Re-Analysis

The Allometry of Leaf Form in Early Plant Ontogeny

The Scaling Relationships Between Leaf Mass And Leaf Area Of Vascular Plant Species Change With Altitude

A Concept Model about Allometric Scaling of Hierarchical Energy Flow Through Plant Biosystems

Insights Into Plant Size-Density Relationships From Models And Agricultural Crops

Scaling of leaf area with biomass in trees reconsidered: constant metabolically active sapwood volume per unit leaf area with height growth

Trade-Offs Between The Metabolic Rate And Population Density Of Plants

Evaluating general allometric models: interspecific and intraspecific data tell different stories due to interspecific variation in stem tissue density and leaf size

A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology

Plant mass-density relationship along a moisture gradient in north-west China

Metabolic scaling is governed by Murray's network in animals and by hydraulic conductance and photosynthesis in plants

The underlying basis for the trade‐off between leaf size and leafing intensity

Intra- and inter-specific scaling laws of plants and animals

Scaling relationships of lamina mass per unit area, mean thickness, and leaf bulk tissue density across nine diverse species

Plant Interactions Alter the Predictions of Metabolic Scaling Theory

An Allometric Scaling Law in Plants