P2.01-083 Prognostic Factors of Overall Survival in 150 Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: Topic: Marker for Prognosis

Yue Cheng,Ping Zhou,Zhixin Qiu,Dan Liu,Weimin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.1135
IF: 20.121
2017-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:The 2011 IASLC/ATS/ERS pathological classification of pulmonary adenocarcinoma(ADC) gives new direction to clinical individualized treatment strategies and prognostic evaluation. We analyzed the prognostic effect of invasive ADC sub-types according to the new classification system. 150 invasive lung ADCs resected in West China Hospital from 2008 to 2013 was analyzed in 5% increments, and classified and graded according to their predominant patterns, as proposed by the IASLC/ATS/ERS. Clinical data, including smoking status, chemotherapy/ radiotherapy after surgery and patient outcomes were collected. Overall survival was evaluated. Tumor necrosis (p=0.033), poor differentiation (p=0.027), lymph node metastasis (p<0.001), surgical procedures (p=0.010), tumor diameter (p<0.001), and TNM stage (p<0.05) were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Solid predominant ADCs (SPA) had a shorter OS than non-SPAs (43.5 vs 65.3 months, p=0.014). High-risk group (including SPA and micro-papillary predominant ADCs, MPA for short) had a poorer prognosis than low-risk group (including lepidic predominant, acinar predominant and papillary predominant ADCs, LPA, APA and PPA for short respectively) (44.4 vs 65.1 months, p=0.025). ADCs with papillary growth patterns (PP) had a better OS than those without PP (67.1 vs 42.5 months, p=0.001). In patients treated with chemo-or radiotherapy after surgery, OS of SPA and ADCs with PP were comparable to that of non-SPA and ADCs without PP, respectively (p value>0.05). Smoking also increased the risk of poor OS in certain subtypes significantly. Multivariate analysis showed SPA, high-risk group and ADCs with PP were independent prognosis factors for OS. Growth pattern and grading system are effective prognosticators of OS in invasive lung ADCs, which also influenced by other factors like post-operative chemo-/radio-therapy and smoking status. These results will give an instruction to the future individualized treatment of lung ADCs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?