Application of F-18-FDG PET/CT in primary thyroid lymphoma

Yang Fan,Zhi Yang,Xuejuan Wang
2015-01-01
Abstract:1370 Objectives This study aims to analyze the predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with primary thyroid lymphoma (PTL). Methods Between September 2009 and February 2014, sixty PTL and six secondary thyroid lymphoma were diagnosed in 1101 patients with lymphoma via biopsy and tumor resection. Information on patient with PTL was collected. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed at baseline and at interim (after 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy). The evaluation of initial PET/CT was carried out by the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The response of PET was assessed based on a combined evaluation of the Deauville five-point scale (5-PS), the rates of reduction in the maximal standardized uptake value (%ΔSUVmax). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Curves (KM) and log-rank test. Results PTL develops mostly in middle-aged and older females. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) were major histologic types of PTL. SUVmax of thyroid in baseline PET was relate to IPI score, but was not a good prognostic factor for the outcome of patients with PTL. The prognostic value of interim PET was much better when using a Deauville score ≥ 4 than when using %ΔSUVmax with the threshold of 80.03% or 66%: for the Deauville score the 2-year PFS and OS both estimate was 100% in PET-negative patients vs. 33.3%±27.2% in PET-positive patients (P= 0.027); for the 80%ΔSUVmax cut-off the 2-year PFS and OS both estimate was 100% in PET-negative patients vs. 60.0%±21.9% in PET-positive patients (P=0.180); for 66%ΔSUVmax cut-off the 2-year PFS and OS both estimate was 80.0%±17.9% in PET-negative patients vs. 75.0%±21.7% in PET-positive patients (P=0.795,P=0.937). Conclusions Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT may predict PFS and OS and could be considered in the prognostic evaluation of PTL. Deauville five-point scale is superior to %ΔSUVmax criteria in the response assessment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?