165 the Impact of Surgical Treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Male Erectile Function: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Z. Li,P. Chen,Y. Guo,H. Xiang,Q. Mao,G. Zeng,H. Xiao,D. Xu,X. Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.112
2017-01-01
Abstract:Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in adult men and can impair erectile function (EF). It was believed surgical treatments for this illness can improve EF due to the relief of LUTS while they were also reported harmed EF as heating or injury effect. Current network meta-analysis aimed to elucidate this discrepancy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Direct comparisons were conducted by STATA 12.0. Network meta-analysis was conducted by Generate Mixed Treatment Comparison (GeMTC). Random effects models were used to calculate pooled standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals and to incorporate variation between studies. Eighteen RCTs with 2433 participants were analyzed. Nine approaches were studied as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), Holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), Thulium laser, open prostatectomy (OP) and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP). In direct comparisons, all surgical treatments did not decrease post-operative International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score except PVP. Moreover, patients who underwent HoLEP, PKEP, Thulium laser and TURP had their post-operative EF significantly increased. Network analysis including direct and indirect comparisons ranked LSP at the highest position on the variation of IIEF-5 score, followed by PKRP, HoLEP, TURP, Thulium laser, PKEP, PVP, HoLRP and OP. But the network outcomes of LSP, HoLRP and Thulium laser should be identified uncertain as they are not enclosed in the comparative circle. PKRP rank the second, although bipolar resection showed no effect on EF in direct comparison due to decreased baseline IIEF-5 score. In subgroup analysis, only PVP was found lower post-operative EF in the short-term and decreased baseline group while TURP increased post-operative IIEF-5 score only for patients with normal baseline IIEF-5 score. However, HoLEP and PKEP showed pro-erectile effect even for patients with decreased baseline IIEF-5 score and short-term follow-up.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?