Determination of opening velocities for vacuum circuit breakers at transmission voltage

Xiaofei Yao,Jianhua Wang,Yingsan Geng,Zhiyuan Liu,Xiaoshe Zhai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DEIV.2016.7748703
2016-01-01
Abstract:The objective of this paper is to propose a quantitative method to determine opening velocities for VCBs at transmission voltage. A couple of 2/3 coil-type axial magnetic field (AMF) contacts, which are used in a 126 kV vacuum interrupter, are arranged in a demountable vacuum chamber. The movable contact is opening with three different kinds of opening travel-curves. Each curve is adjusted by two opening velocities, v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</inf> and v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> , respectively. The v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</inf> is an average opening velocity within 1/3 full contact gap, which is with 1.8 m/s, 2.4 m/s and 2.7 m/s, respectively. The v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> is an average opening velocity within 2/3 full contact gap, which is with 2.4 m/s, 2.7 m/s, and 3.0 m/s, respectively. The test current ranges from 4 kA to 40 kA, stepped by 4 kA. When a VCB is used to interrupt a short-circuit current, the preferred opening velocity is determined by reducing the arcing interval t <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">I</inf> for the intense arc mode and increasing the arcing interval t <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">II</inf> until the formation of high-current anode mode (HAM). The preferred v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</inf> is higher than a threshold value v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1_th</inf> , at which there is a peak critical contact gap d <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">I_peak</inf> , for the evolving from intense arc mode into diffuse arc mode. The preferred value v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> is lower than another threshold value v <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2_th</inf> , at which there also exists a peak critical contact gap d <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">II_peak</inf> , for the evolving from diffuse arc mode into the footpoint mode and anode spot mode.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?