Analysis of Difference Between the Objective Effect and Subjective Effect in Rehabilitation Treatment of Dysphagia after Stroke

徐邵红,田闪,胡瑞萍,吴军发,姜从玉,李丹丹,余克威,吴毅
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1329.2016.05017
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the reason of the difference of clinical curative effect after rehabilitation treatment for stroke patients with dysphagia.Methods:A total of thirty stroke patients with dysphagia were evaluated with standardized swallowing assessment (SSA), video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and swallowing disorder patient's quality of life scale (SWAL-QOL).Results:After four weeks of rehabilitation treatment, the SSA, VFSS and SWAL-QOL scores were significantly increased (P<0.01), and the SWAL-QOL score was lower than the SSA or VFSS score, but there was not a significant difference among them.Conclusion:A reason for the differences of SSA, VFSS and SWAL-QOL is the objectivity and subjectivity of curative evaluation. SWAL-QOL score is focus on the subjective effect and lower, suggesting that for patients with dysphagia, the psychological burden of swallowing disorder has a significant impact on the clinical outcome of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?