1397 Screening for Effects of Live Yeast or Yeast Derivative on Dry Matter Disappearance in Batch Culture

P. X. Jiao,F. Liu,Z. X. He,S. Ding,N. D. Walker,K. A. Beauchemin,T. W. Alexander,W. Z. Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-1397
2016-01-01
Abstract:The objective of this study was to screen for the effects of live yeast (LY) or yeast derivative (YD) on DM disappearance (DMD) in batch culture varying yeast products, media pH and dosage of yeast. The study was arranged in a 5 yeasts × 2 pH × 4 dosages + monensin (positive control) factorial design. Substrate was a high-grain diet containing 10% barley silage and 90% concentrate (DM basis). Five yeast products were 3 LY (LY1, LY2, LY3) and 2 YD (YD4, YD5). The buffer pH was low (5.8) and high (6.5). Doses of LY (cfu/ml) were control (no LY), 4 × 106, 8 × 106and 1.6 × 107, and doses of YD (mg/bottle) were control (no YD), 15, 30, and 60. The dose of monensin was 0.17 mg/bottle. Inoculum was obtained from 2 ruminally fistulated beef heifers fed the same diets to the substrate. Substrate (0.75 g) ground through a 1-mm sieve was weighed into a filter bag and incubated for 24 h in a gas-tight culture bottle in 3 replications by each combination of treatments. The culture was repeated at different day. Data were analyzed using mixed procedure of SAS with a model that includes fixed effects of yeast, pH, dosages, and 2 way interactions, and the random effects of day. There was interaction (P < 0.05) of LY2, LY3, YD4 and YD5 with media pH or yeast with its dosage. Supplementation of LY1 had higher (P < 0.01) DMD (61%) at pH 6.5, whereas the DMD was lowest (P < 0.05) for YD5 (54%) and medium for other yeasts (averaged 57%). Increased media pH from 5.8 to 6.5 improved (P < 0.01) DMD (low vs. high pH; averaged 47 vs. 59%). Increasing the dose of LY3 and YD5 linearly (P < 0.05) increased the DMD at pH 6.5 with no dose effect of other yeasts. Adding monensin overall improved (P < 0.05) the DMD (62 vs. 57%) compared with yeasts at pH 6.5; whereas, at pH 5.8, the DMD was lower with monensin (44%) vs. LY2 (47%; P < 0.05), LY3 (47%; P < 0.05) or YD5 (49%; P < 0.01). These results suggest that in vitro DMD of high-grain diet varied with source and dosage of yeast and media pH. The improved DMD at pH 5.8 with LY2, LY3 and YD5 over monensin would be beneficial to high-grain fed cattle.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?