0652 Comparison of Dry Matter Measurements Between Three Hand-Held Near-Infrared Units with Oven Drying at Sixty Degrees Celsius for Forty-Eight Hours

D. M. Donnelly,H. Yang,D. K. Combs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-0652
2016-01-01
Abstract:This study compared DM predictions of three hand-held near infrared spectrophotometer (NIRS) units (Moisture Tracker, Digi-Star Inc., Fort Atkinson, WI) to conventional oven drying at 60°C using two alfalfa and two corn silages. Corn and alfalfa silages (1,500 g) obtained from the University of Wisconsin Dairy Cattle Center (DCC) and the Arlington Research Station (ARS) were analyzed for DM daily for 20 d. Three NIRS calibrations were also tested within each unit: NIRf, NIRa, and NIRb. The DM predicted from the factory-preset calibrations was NIRf. NIRa was an adjusted DM prediction, where the average difference between oven-dried forage and NIRf determined on duplicate forage samples for 3 d before the experiment was used as a bias adjustment for all subsequent DM determinations. NIRb was a bias-adjusted DM prediction based on the average difference between oven-dried forage and NIRf over the 20-d experiment. NIRb was determined on each forage sample after the experiment had been completed. Each forage was scanned 20 times by each NIRS unit. The average predicted DM from the 20 scans was recorded as the forage DM. The process was repeated three times with each NIRS unit. Two 100-g subsamples of each forage were then oven-dried for 48 h at 60°C daily. Data was analyzed using PROC MIXED (SAS, version 9.3), with method, day, feed, method × day, and method × feed as fixed effects and equipment as the random effect. Oven DM of ARS and DCC alfalfa silages was 37.34 and 48.52%, respectively. Oven DM of ARS and DCC corn silages was 34.69 and 37.41% DM, respectively. NIRf DM predictions were significantly different from their respective oven values for ARS corn silage and ARS haylage (P < 0.0001), and NIRf DM tended to differ from oven DM for DCC Corn Silage; P = 0.06). NIRf and oven DM for DCC haylage were similar (P = 0.99). All NIRb DM values were similar to oven-dried DM for all four forages (P > 0.05). The hand-held NIRS units accurately predicted DM content of the alfalfa and corn silages when the factory preset calibrations were corrected for bias.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?